Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Crop Residue and Potassium Management on Yield, Quality, Nutrient Uptake and Nutrient Use Efficiency by Mungbean in Maize (Zea mays L.)-Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-Mungbean Cropping System

H.N. Meena; K.S. Rana; Ashok Kumar; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2014-15 and 2015-16 on Research Farm of Division of Agronomy, IARI at New Delhi to evaluate Influence of crop residue and potassium management on yield, quality, nutrient uptake and K use efficiencies of mungbean in maize-wheat- mungbean cropping system. The experiment consisted of 15 treatment combinations with three crop residues [no crop residue, crop residue incorporation and fungal consortium incorporation] and five potassium management practices [control, KSB, 100 % RDK, 50% RDK+ KSB and 75% RDK+ KSB]. Results revealed that considerably highest grain yields, protein content, protein yield and N P K concentration both in seed and stalk and its uptake by mungbean were noticed with treatment receiving crop residue incorporation + fungal consortium which was statistically at par with crop residue incorporation. Similar trends were also recorded for K use efficiency, physiological use efficiency, apparent recovery and utilization efficiency during both years of study. Among Potassium management, significantly highest grain yield, protein content, protein yield, N P K concentration, uptake in both seed and stalk and its total uptake were noticed with treatment receiving 75% RDK + KSB which were statistically at par with 50% RDK+ KSB. However, maximum K use efficiency, physiological use efficiency, apparent recovery, utilization efficiency were noticed with treatment receiving 50% RDK+ KSB which were statistically at par with 75% RDK+ KSB as compared to the first year, maximum attributes and efficiencies were observed in the second year of investigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation with fungal consortium produced the highest mungbean grain yield, statistically at par with residue incorporation.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
crop residue incorporation + fungal consortiume0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
crop residue incorporatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“considerably highest grain yields, protein content, protein yield and N P K concentration both in seed and stalk and its uptake by mungbean were noticed with treatment receiving crop residue incorporation + fungal consortium which was statistically at par with crop residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation with fungal consortium produced the highest protein content and protein yield.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
crop residue incorporation + fungal consortiume0
Outcome
protein content, protein yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
crop residue incorporatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yields, protein content, protein yield and N P K concentration both in seed and stalk and its uptake by mungbean were noticed with treatment receiving crop residue incorporation + fungal consortium which was statistically at par with crop residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation with fungal consortium produced the highest N, P and K concentration and uptake in mungbean seed and stalk.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
crop residue incorporation + fungal consortiume0
Outcome
N P K concentration both in seed and stalk and its uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
crop residue incorporatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yields, protein content, protein yield and N P K concentration both in seed and stalk and its uptake by mungbean were noticed with treatment receiving crop residue incorporation + fungal consortium which was statistically at par with crop residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–863 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium use, physiological use, apparent recovery and utilization efficiencies followed the residue treatment trend in both years.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
K use efficiency, physiological use efficiency, apparent recovery and utilization efficiencye0
Qualifier
both years of studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar trends were also recorded for K use efficiency, physiological use efficiency, apparent recovery and utilization efficiency during both years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“by Mungbean in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDK plus KSB treatment gave the significantly highest mungbean grain yield, at par with 50% RDK plus KSB.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
75% RDK + KSBe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
50% RDK+ KSBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest grain yield, protein content, protein yield, N P K concentration, uptake in both seed and stalk and its total uptake were noticed with treatment receiving 75% RDK + KSB which were statistically at par with 50% RDK+ KSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“by Mungbean in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDK plus KSB treatment gave the significantly highest protein content and protein yield.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
75% RDK + KSBe0
Outcome
protein content, protein yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
50% RDK+ KSBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest grain yield, protein content, protein yield, N P K concentration, uptake in both seed and stalk and its total uptake were noticed with treatment receiving 75% RDK + KSB which were statistically at par with 50% RDK+ KSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“by Mungbean in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDK plus KSB treatment gave the significantly highest N, P and K concentration and uptake in seed and stalk.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
75% RDK + KSBe0
Outcome
N P K concentration, uptake in both seed and stalk and its total uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
50% RDK+ KSBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly highest grain yield, protein content, protein yield, N P K concentration, uptake in both seed and stalk and its total uptake were noticed with treatment receiving 75% RDK + KSB which were statistically at par with 50% RDK+ KSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“by Mungbean in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% RDK plus KSB treatment maximized four K use efficiency measures and was at par with 75% RDK plus KSB.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
50% RDK+ KSBe0
Outcome
K use efficiency, physiological use efficiency, apparent recovery, utilization efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
75% RDK+ KSBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum K use efficiency, physiological use efficiency, apparent recovery, utilization efficiency were noticed with treatment receiving 50% RDK+ KSB which were statistically at par with 75% RDK+ KSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“by Mungbean in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most measured attributes and efficiencies were greater in the second year than in the first.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
attributes and efficienciese0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
first yeare0
Setting
second year of investigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as compared to the first year, maximum attributes and efficiencies were observed in the second year of investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“by Mungbean in Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–134 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.