Abstract
Th e aim of the study was to evaluate the eff ect of diff erent soil tillage on yield of spring barley from a long-term stationary fi eld experiment.Th e experiment was conducted in period from 1990 to 2014 on loamy chernozem soil in a sugar beet growing region.Spring barley was grown in three crop rotations, always aft er sugar beet which was set aft er silage maize, winter wheat and spring barley.Four variants of soil tillage were evaluated: 1. ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m; 2. ploughing to the depth of 0.15 m); 3. direct sowing into non-prepare soil; 4. loosening to the depth of 0,10 m.Infl uence of experimental factors on yield was evaluated in 1990-2014.Infl uence of experimental factors on yields was statistically signifi cant.Th e highest average yield was reached in the crop rotation -spring barley, sugar beet, spring barley and the lowest yield in the crop rotation -silage maize, sugar beet, spring barley.In all three crop rotations the highest average yield was on variant with ploughing to 0.15 m (6.68 tha -1 ) and the lowest on variant with ploughing to 0.22 m (6.54 tha -1 ).Minimum soil tillage technologies with direct sowing (6.64 tha -1 ) and loosening to 0.10 m (6.62 tha -1 ) had a middle grain yields.Results of this observation shows that lower intensity of soil tillage in case of spring barley grown aft er sugar beet, under conditions of the given locality, is a suitable alternative to traditional way of soil tillage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Experimental factors significantly affected barley yields.
- Taxon
- Spring Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- experimental factorse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Infl uence of experimental factors on yields was statistically signifi cant.”
t0“Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley yield was highest in the spring barley–sugar beet–spring barley rotation.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- spring barley, sugar beet, spring barleye0
- Outcome
- average yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- silage maize, sugar beet, spring barleye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Th e highest average yield was reached in the crop rotation -spring barley, sugar beet, spring barley and the lowest yield in the crop rotation -silage maize, sugar beet, spring barley.”
t0“Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley yield was lowest in the silage maize–sugar beet–spring barley rotation.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- silage maize, sugar beet, spring barleye0
- Outcome
- average yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Comparator
- spring barley, sugar beet, spring barleye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Th e highest average yield was reached in the crop rotation -spring barley, sugar beet, spring barley and the lowest yield in the crop rotation -silage maize, sugar beet, spring barley.”
t0“Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ploughing to 0.15 m gave the highest average yield, 6.68 tha -1.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- ploughing to 0.15 me0
- Outcome
- average yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 6.68 tha -1e0
- Comparator
- ploughing to 0.22 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest average yield was on variant with ploughing to 0.15 m (6.68 tha -1 ) and the lowest on variant with ploughing to 0.22 m (6.54 tha -1 )”
t0“Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ploughing to 0.22 m gave the lowest average yield, 6.54 tha -1.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- ploughing to 0.22 me0
- Outcome
- average yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 6.54 tha -1e0
- Comparator
- ploughing to 0.15 me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest average yield was on variant with ploughing to 0.15 m (6.68 tha -1 ) and the lowest on variant with ploughing to 0.22 m (6.54 tha -1 )”
t0“Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
Claim · model-written summary
Direct sowing produced a middle grain yield of 6.64 tha -1.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- direct sowinge0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- middlee0
- Value
- 6.64 tha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Minimum soil tillage technologies with direct sowing (6.64 tha -1 ) and loosening to 0.10 m (6.62 tha -1 ) had a middle grain yields.”
t0“Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
Claim · model-written summary
Loosening to 0.10 m produced a middle grain yield of 6.62 tha -1.
- Taxon
- Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- loosening to 0.10 me0
- Outcome
- grain yieldse0
- Direction
- middlee0
- Value
- 6.62 tha -1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Minimum soil tillage technologies with direct sowing (6.64 tha -1 ) and loosening to 0.10 m (6.62 tha -1 ) had a middle grain yields.”
t0“Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower intensity tillage after sugar beet was considered suitable for barley in the locality.
- Taxon
- spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Outcome
- lower intensity of soil tillagee0
- Qualifier
- grown aft er sugar beet, under conditions of the given localitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lower intensity of soil tillage in case of spring barley grown aft er sugar beet, under conditions of the given locality, is a suitable alternative to traditional way of soil tillage.”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →processing · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.