Paper · 2017 · JOURNAL OF ADVANCED APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

Eco-friendly food preservation: Studies on the synergistic preservative effect of Chitosan and soap nut solution

Noorjahan S.E; Porchezhiyan V

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chitosan (CS), the antimicrobial, biopolymer with film forming nature, has been used as a topical preservative for food items like vegetables, fruits, and even for sea food.1In order to have different choices for preservation; we need to search for more materials with such properties. Soap nut (SN), whose botanical name is Sapindus mukorossi, seems to have similar properties. It is saponin, the major component present in soap nut, which is responsible for its antimicrobial and film forming property. There are many reports to support that up to a certain limit saponin can be used for edible purpose.2In this study the synergistic preservative effect of chitosan and soap nut aqueous solutions on fruits and vegetables was evaluated. At first, the antimicrobial effect of CS, SN and [CS+SN] in the film form was studied against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli. As expected the film CS+SN exhibited more antimicrobial activity with 25 mm and 23mm zone of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli respectively. The potential of CS+SN as a preservative was evaluated by spraying a known concentration on different regional fruits like lemon, banana, tomato and orange. Different concentrations of [CS+SN] - 250ppm and 125ppm, along with CS-500ppm, SN-500ppm and water, were compared, where water served as the control. Fruits sprayed with [CS+SN]-250ppm solution, showed significant delay in the change of weight loss, decay percentage, pH, as compared to control fruits. It also maintained better visual quality than CS and SN coated as well as control samples. These findings suggest that [CS+SN], with its synergistic preservative potential will maintain the fruit quality and lead to better acceptance by consumers. Thus Chitosan along with soap nut solution will be a cost effective, eco-friendly and easy to utilize preservative system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CS+SN film had larger zones of inhibition than CS or SN alone against S. aureus and E. coli.

Treatment
film CS+SNe1
Outcome
zone of inhibitione1
Value
25 mme1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“the film CS+SN exhibited more antimicrobial activity with 25 mm and 23mm zone of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits sprayed with 250 ppm CS+SN solution showed a significant delay in weight loss and decay percentage compared with control fruits.

Taxon
lemon, banana, tomato and orangee2
Treatment
[CS+SN]-250ppm solutione3
Outcome
weight losse3
Direction
significant delaye3
Comparator
control fruitse3

Verbatim

e2

“spraying a known concentration on different regional fruits like lemon, banana, tomato and orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1201 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruits sprayed with [CS+SN]-250ppm solution, showed significant delay in the change of weight loss, decay percentage, pH, as compared to control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits sprayed with CS+SN at 250 ppm kept better visual quality than fruits coated with CS or SN.

Taxon
lemon, banana, tomato and orangee2
Treatment
[CS+SN]-250ppm solutione3
Outcome
visual qualitye4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
CS and SN coatede4

Verbatim

e2

“spraying a known concentration on different regional fruits like lemon, banana, tomato and orange”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1201 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruits sprayed with [CS+SN]-250ppm solution, showed significant delay in the change of weight loss, decay percentage, pH, as compared to control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1504 · show in text ↑
e4

“It also maintained better visual quality than CS and SN coated as well as control samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1595 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · MusaResults differ

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 39 positive, 1 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

chitosan · quality: general · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Citrus x limon (lemon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.