Abstract
Chitosan (CS), the antimicrobial, biopolymer with film forming nature, has been used as a topical preservative for food items like vegetables, fruits, and even for sea food.1In order to have different choices for preservation; we need to search for more materials with such properties. Soap nut (SN), whose botanical name is Sapindus mukorossi, seems to have similar properties. It is saponin, the major component present in soap nut, which is responsible for its antimicrobial and film forming property. There are many reports to support that up to a certain limit saponin can be used for edible purpose.2In this study the synergistic preservative effect of chitosan and soap nut aqueous solutions on fruits and vegetables was evaluated. At first, the antimicrobial effect of CS, SN and [CS+SN] in the film form was studied against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli. As expected the film CS+SN exhibited more antimicrobial activity with 25 mm and 23mm zone of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli respectively. The potential of CS+SN as a preservative was evaluated by spraying a known concentration on different regional fruits like lemon, banana, tomato and orange. Different concentrations of [CS+SN] - 250ppm and 125ppm, along with CS-500ppm, SN-500ppm and water, were compared, where water served as the control. Fruits sprayed with [CS+SN]-250ppm solution, showed significant delay in the change of weight loss, decay percentage, pH, as compared to control fruits. It also maintained better visual quality than CS and SN coated as well as control samples. These findings suggest that [CS+SN], with its synergistic preservative potential will maintain the fruit quality and lead to better acceptance by consumers. Thus Chitosan along with soap nut solution will be a cost effective, eco-friendly and easy to utilize preservative system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The CS+SN film had larger zones of inhibition than CS or SN alone against S. aureus and E. coli.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e1“the film CS+SN exhibited more antimicrobial activity with 25 mm and 23mm zone of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia Coli respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruits sprayed with 250 ppm CS+SN solution showed a significant delay in weight loss and decay percentage compared with control fruits.
Verbatim
e2“spraying a known concentration on different regional fruits like lemon, banana, tomato and orange”
e3“Fruits sprayed with [CS+SN]-250ppm solution, showed significant delay in the change of weight loss, decay percentage, pH, as compared to control fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruits sprayed with CS+SN at 250 ppm kept better visual quality than fruits coated with CS or SN.
Verbatim
e2“spraying a known concentration on different regional fruits like lemon, banana, tomato and orange”
e3“Fruits sprayed with [CS+SN]-250ppm solution, showed significant delay in the change of weight loss, decay percentage, pH, as compared to control fruits”
e4“It also maintained better visual quality than CS and SN coated as well as control samples”
The same questions in other papers
chitosan · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →chitosan · quality: postharvest · MusaResults differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →chitosan · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →chitosan · quality: general · MusaResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
chitosan · quality: postharvest · Citrus x limon (lemon)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
chitosan · quality: postharvest · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.