Paper · 2018 · Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia

Effects Fertilizer on Mungbean Crops and its Residual on Cowpea

Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi, Jl. Raya Kendalpayak KM 8, PO Box 66, Malang 6510; Sri Ayu Dwi Lestari; . Sutrisno; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine the effect of fertilization on four varieties mungbean in ultisol acid soils and its residual on cowpea. The experiment was conducted at the screen house of Indonesian Legumes and Tuber Crops Research Institute (ILETRI), Malang, East Java, from November 2014-April 2015. Two types of research conducted sequentially, the first planting was four mungbean varieties and the second planting was cowpea (continued from the first planting) without additional fertilizer. This experiment was laid out in split plot design, replicated three times. In the first planting, mungbean as the main plot, namely Kenari (V1), Murai (V2), Kutilang (V3), and Vima 1 (V4). Fertilizer rates as the sub plot, namely control or without fertilizer (P0), 300 kg Phonska/ha (P1), 1500 kg cow manure/ha (P2), 3000 kg cow manure/ha (P3), and 5000 kg cow manure/ha (P4). The cowpea variety used in the second planting was KT 4, with the experiment design following the first planting. The results from first planting showed that growth of mungbean varieties was relatively same at ultisol acid soils, and seed yield can increase by application 300 kg/ha Phonska or 3000 kg cow manure/ha. The growth of cowpea showed the best result on both fertilizers indicating the presence of fertilizer residue from first planting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four mungbean varieties had relatively similar growth on ultisol acid soils.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Material
mungbean varietiese0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
relatively samee0
Setting
ultisol acid soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of mungbean varieties was relatively same at ultisol acid soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phonska at 300 kg/ha increased mungbean seed yield.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
300 kg/ha Phonskae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
without fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield can increase by application 300 kg/ha Phonska or 3000 kg cow manure/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“control or without fertilizer (P0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow manure at 3000 kg/ha increased mungbean seed yield.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
3000 kg cow manure/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
without fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield can increase by application 300 kg/ha Phonska or 3000 kg cow manure/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1207 · show in text ↑
e1

“control or without fertilizer (P0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual Phonska from the first planting gave cowpea the best growth.

Treatment
300 kg Phonska/hae1
Outcome
growth of cowpeae0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
fertilizer residue from first plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of cowpea showed the best result on both fertilizers indicating the presence of fertilizer residue from first planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1339 · show in text ↑
e1

“300 kg Phonska/ha (P1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual cow manure from the first planting gave cowpea the best growth.

Treatment
3000 kg cow manure/hae1
Outcome
growth of cowpeae0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
fertilizer residue from first plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of cowpea showed the best result on both fertilizers indicating the presence of fertilizer residue from first planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1339 · show in text ↑
e1

“3000 kg cow manure/ha (P3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–858 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 131 positive, 12 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.