Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Type and placement of zinc fertilizer impacts cadmium content of harvested durum wheat grain

Shana M. Forster; John R. Rickertsen; Grant H. Mehring; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Due to potential international marketing concerns, North Dakota durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. Desf.) producers require strategies that limit cadmium (Cd) in harvested grain. These trials were conducted in order to determine the impact of type and placement of zinc (Zn) fertilizer on harvested grain seed Cd levels and to determine the best timing of foliar Zn-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Foliar Zn-EDTA applied at Feekes 10 growth stage had the lowest grain Cd of 0.97 mg kg−1 when evaluating different fertilizer sources and application timings. Application of 22.4 kg ha−1 potassium chloride with the seed at planting resulted in the highest grain Cd of 0.151 mg kg−1 and might be a concern when environmental conditions are conducive for Cd uptake from soil. Stepwise linear regression determined that soil pH and chloride explained 96% of the variability of grain Cd. Applying 1.1 kg Zn ha−1 as foliar Zn-EDTA in combination with 33 kg nitrogen ha−1 at Feekes 10.54 growth stage resulted in significantly lower grain Cd, and significantly higher grain Zn, iron, and protein content. Treatments that significantly lowered grain Cd did not decrease grain yield, test weight, or protein content. The treatments that most reduced grain Cd resulted in the most benefits from a production, marketing, and nutritional standpoint and represents an agronomic approach to biofortification of durum wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn-EDTA at Feekes 10 gave the lowest grain cadmium, 0.97 mg kg−1.

Treatment
Foliar Zn-EDTA applied at Feekes 10 growth stagee0
Outcome
grain Cde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.97 mg kg−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar Zn-EDTA applied at Feekes 10 growth stage had the lowest grain Cd of 0.97 mg kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Type and placement of zinc fertilizer impacts cadmium content of harvested durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium chloride with seed gave the highest grain cadmium, 0.151 mg kg−1.

Treatment
22.4 kg ha−1 potassium chloride with the seed at plantinge0
Outcome
grain Cde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.151 mg kg−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 22.4 kg ha−1 potassium chloride with the seed at planting resulted in the highest grain Cd of 0.151 mg kg−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Type and placement of zinc fertilizer impacts cadmium content of harvested durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and chloride explained 96% of grain cadmium variability.

Outcome
variability of grain Cde0
Value
96%e0
Setting
soil pH and chloridee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil pH and chloride explained 96% of the variability of grain Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Type and placement of zinc fertilizer impacts cadmium content of harvested durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn-EDTA with nitrogen significantly lowered grain cadmium.

Treatment
1.1 kg Zn ha−1 as foliar Zn-EDTA in combination with 33 kg nitrogen ha−1 at Feekes 10.54 growth stagee0
Outcome
grain Cde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 1.1 kg Zn ha−1 as foliar Zn-EDTA in combination with 33 kg nitrogen ha−1 at Feekes 10.54 growth stage resulted in significantly lower grain Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Type and placement of zinc fertilizer impacts cadmium content of harvested durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fertilizer combination significantly increased grain zinc, iron and protein content.

Outcome
grain Zn, iron, and protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher grain Zn, iron, and protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Type and placement of zinc fertilizer impacts cadmium content of harvested durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium-lowering treatments did not decrease grain yield, test weight or protein content.

Treatment
Treatments that significantly lowered grain Cde0
Outcome
grain yield, test weight, or protein contente0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments that significantly lowered grain Cd did not decrease grain yield, test weight, or protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Type and placement of zinc fertilizer impacts cadmium content of harvested durum wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.