Abstract
The particular weed management practice is still know that describes the exact solution for weed control and maximizes the yield and profitability of maize production and weed severs to more than 40% loss in production. So, the field experiment was conducted in Farmer’s field to compare the effects of different weed management practices on weed growth and dynamics, yield, and economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition at Aswara-5, Tulsipur, and Dang in 2017. The experiment was conducted in Randomized Complete Block Design with seven treatments and three replications. The treatments consisted of (i) Framer practices, (ii) control, (iii) weed free broadcasting (iv) Weed free line sowing (v) power weeded (vi) Manually weeded (vii) herbicides (Temboterine and Atrazine). The different weed managements practice showed significant effect in Yield, test weight, Harvest index, stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percent and cob length. The higher grain yield was obtained in herbicide treated plot (7.620 t/ha) and least in control plot (3.54 t/ha) and farmer practice plot (4.32 t/ha) where other treatment were statistically at par with each other. The highest shelling and cob length was 78.33 and 21.76 cm found highest that leads to highest yield and lower yield in control and farmer plot. The cost of cultivation was higher in weed free line sowing (NRs 89102) and broadcasting (NRs 89106) condition but the production per unit cost was highest in herbicides (109.27 g/Rs) plot and followed by manual (69.73 g/Rs) and power weeded plot(78.11 g/Rs). Similarly, the highest Net revenue, Gross revenue and Benefit cost ratio was obtained in Herbicide treated plot among all the treatment, which is followed by power weeded plot. So, we can conclude that, herbicide treated plot is economically and profitability important in terms of production where there is human labour crisis.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide treatment gave the highest maize grain yield, 7.620 t/ha.
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e1“The higher grain yield was obtained in herbicide treated plot (7.620 t/ha) and least in control plot (3.54 t/ha) and farmer practice plot (4.32 t/ha) where other treatment were statistically at par with each other”
Claim · model-written summary
The control plot gave the lowest maize grain yield, 3.54 t/ha.
- Treatment
- control plote1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- leaste1
- Value
- 3.54 t/hae1
- Comparator
- herbicide treated plote1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e1“The higher grain yield was obtained in herbicide treated plot (7.620 t/ha) and least in control plot (3.54 t/ha) and farmer practice plot (4.32 t/ha) where other treatment were statistically at par with each other”
Claim · model-written summary
The farmer practice plot gave the lowest maize grain yield, 4.32 t/ha.
- Treatment
- farmer practice plote1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- leaste1
- Value
- 4.32 t/hae1
- Comparator
- herbicide treated plote1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e1“The higher grain yield was obtained in herbicide treated plot (7.620 t/ha) and least in control plot (3.54 t/ha) and farmer practice plot (4.32 t/ha) where other treatment were statistically at par with each other”
Claim · model-written summary
The other weed management treatments had statistically equal maize grain yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e1“The higher grain yield was obtained in herbicide treated plot (7.620 t/ha) and least in control plot (3.54 t/ha) and farmer practice plot (4.32 t/ha) where other treatment were statistically at par with each other”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed management practices had a significant effect on yield, test weight and harvest index.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e2“The different weed managements practice showed significant effect in Yield, test weight, Harvest index, stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percent and cob length”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed management practices had a significant effect on stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percent.
- Treatment
- different weed managements practicee2
- Outcome
- stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percente2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e2“The different weed managements practice showed significant effect in Yield, test weight, Harvest index, stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percent and cob length”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed management practices had a significant effect on cob length.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e2“The different weed managements practice showed significant effect in Yield, test weight, Harvest index, stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percent and cob length”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest shelling percentage was 78.33 under the weed management practice with the highest yield.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e3“The highest shelling and cob length was 78.33 and 21.76 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest cob length was 21.76 cm under the weed management practice with the highest yield.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e3“The highest shelling and cob length was 78.33 and 21.76 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed free line sowing had higher cost of cultivation, NRs 89102.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e4“The cost of cultivation was higher in weed free line sowing (NRs 89102) and broadcasting (NRs 89106) condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Broadcasting had higher cost of cultivation, NRs 89106.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e4“The cost of cultivation was higher in weed free line sowing (NRs 89102) and broadcasting (NRs 89106) condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide gave the highest production per unit cost, 109.27 g/Rs.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e5“the production per unit cost was highest in herbicides (109.27 g/Rs) plot”
Claim · model-written summary
Manual weeding had production per unit cost of 69.73 g/Rs, following herbicide.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e5“the production per unit cost was highest in herbicides (109.27 g/Rs) plot”
e6“followed by manual (69.73 g/Rs) and power weeded plot(78.11 g/Rs)”
Claim · model-written summary
Power weeding had production per unit cost of 78.11 g/Rs, following herbicide and manual weeding.
- Treatment
- power weeded plote6
- Outcome
- production per unit coste5
- Direction
- followed bye6
- Value
- 78.11 g/Rse6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e5“the production per unit cost was highest in herbicides (109.27 g/Rs) plot”
e6“followed by manual (69.73 g/Rs) and power weeded plot(78.11 g/Rs)”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide gave the highest net revenue, gross revenue and benefit cost ratio among all treatments.
- Treatment
- Herbicidee7
- Outcome
- Net revenue, Gross revenue and Benefit cost ratioe7
- Direction
- higheste7
- Comparator
- all the treatmente7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e7“the highest Net revenue, Gross revenue and Benefit cost ratio was obtained in Herbicide treated plot among all the treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide-treated plots are economically and profitably important for maize production where labour is short.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition”
e1“herbicide treated plot is economically and profitability important in terms of production”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 88 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
126 papers more in this group
See all 130 papers →herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
647 papers more in this group
See all 651 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.