Abstract
The average yield of seeds obtained for the two years of the research was 7.70 t·ha -1 and it was lower than the one obtained in tillage cultivation by 1.5%. The stock of ears in the area unit was larger on the objects with no-tillage cultivation by 1.5%. The ears from the objects with no-tillage cultivation were longer by 0.6%. The mass of the grain in the ear and the quantity of grains in the ear was larger on the objects with no-tillage cultivation by ca. 2.5%, while the mass of one thousand of seeds was greater by 0.9%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Hybrid rye seed yield under no-tillage cultivation was 1.5% lower than under tillage cultivation.
- Taxon
- HYBRID RYE
Secale cerealet0 - Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione1
- Outcome
- yield of seedse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 1.5%e0
- Qualifier
- 7.70 t·ha -1e0
- Comparator
- tillage cultivatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“HYBRID RYE”
e0“The average yield of seeds obtained for the two years of the research was 7.70 t·ha -1 and it was lower than the one obtained in tillage cultivation by 1.5%”
e1“The stock of ears in the area unit was larger on the objects with no-tillage cultivation by 1.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Under no-tillage cultivation the stock of ears in the area unit was 1.5% larger.
- Taxon
- HYBRID RYE
Secale cerealet0 - Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione1
- Outcome
- stock of ears in the area unite1
- Direction
- largere1
- Value
- 1.5%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“HYBRID RYE”
e1“The stock of ears in the area unit was larger on the objects with no-tillage cultivation by 1.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Under no-tillage cultivation the ears were 0.6% longer.
- Taxon
- HYBRID RYE
Secale cerealet0 - Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione2
- Outcome
- earse2
- Direction
- longere2
- Value
- 0.6%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“HYBRID RYE”
e2“The ears from the objects with no-tillage cultivation were longer by 0.6%”
Claim · model-written summary
Under no-tillage cultivation the grain mass and grain number per ear were ca. 2.5% larger.
- Taxon
- HYBRID RYE
Secale cerealet0 - Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione3
- Outcome
- mass of the grain in the ear and the quantity of grains in the eare3
- Direction
- largere3
- Value
- ca. 2.5%e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“HYBRID RYE”
e3“The mass of the grain in the ear and the quantity of grains in the ear was larger on the objects with no-tillage cultivation by ca. 2.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Under no-tillage cultivation the mass of one thousand seeds was 0.9% greater.
- Taxon
- HYBRID RYE
Secale cerealet0 - Treatment
- no-tillage cultivatione1
- Outcome
- mass of one thousand of seedse4
- Direction
- greatere4
- Value
- 0.9%e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“HYBRID RYE”
e1“The stock of ears in the area unit was larger on the objects with no-tillage cultivation by 1.5%”
e4“the mass of one thousand of seeds was greater by 0.9%”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.