Paper · 2018 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Genetic variation for tolerance to post-emergence herbicide, imazethapyr in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)

Sheetal Raj Sharma; Sarvjeet Singh; Navneet Aggarwal; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weeds pose a serious constraint to lentil production. Identification and deployment of post-emergence herbicide tolerance in improved varieties can help reduce the production cost and increase the productivity and area under lentil cultivation. Imazethapyr, a post-emergence herbicide was tested on 180 lentil genotypes for two consecutive years. Significant variation among the genotypes was observed for tolerance to imazethapyr. On a 1–5 scale, 12 genotypes were found tolerant, 46 moderately tolerant, 112 sensitive and 10 highly sensitive during the first season, and 11 genotypes were found tolerant, 51 moderately tolerant, 110 sensitive and 8 highly sensitive during the second season. Based on the first year’s result, 30 genotypes, representing tolerant, moderately tolerant, sensitive and highly sensitive reactions, were evaluated to determine the effect of herbicide on morpho-physiological and yield traits. The adverse effect of imazethapyr was significant on growth and yield attributes of lentils. Five genotypes namely LL699, LL1397, IPL406, EC78452 and LL1203 demonstrated tolerance to imazethapyr with limited phytotoxic effect on various morpho-physiological traits. These genotypes showed less reduction (<19%) for seed yield in imazethapyr treated plots as compared to control. These genotypes offer scope for developing post-emergence herbicide tolerant cultivars in lentil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil genotypes varied significantly in imazethapyr tolerance.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
tolerance to imazethapyre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant variation among the genotypes was observed for tolerance to imazethapyr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–431 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first season, 12 lentil genotypes were tolerant, 46 moderately tolerant, 112 sensitive and 10 highly sensitive.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
tolerant, 46 moderately tolerant, 112 sensitive and 10 highly sensitivee0
Value
12 genotypese0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“12 genotypes were found tolerant, 46 moderately tolerant, 112 sensitive and 10 highly sensitive during the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–567 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second season, 11 lentil genotypes were tolerant, 51 moderately tolerant, 110 sensitive and 8 highly sensitive.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
tolerant, 51 moderately tolerant, 110 sensitive and 8 highly sensitivee0
Value
11 genotypese0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“11 genotypes were found tolerant, 51 moderately tolerant, 110 sensitive and 8 highly sensitive during the second season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr significantly harmed lentil growth and yield attributes.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
imazethapyre0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
adversee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The adverse effect of imazethapyr was significant on growth and yield attributes of lentils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1014 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LL699, LL1397, IPL406, EC78452 and LL1203 tolerated imazethapyr with limited phytotoxic effects.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Material
LL699, LL1397, IPL406, EC78452 and LL1203e0
Outcome
tolerance to imazethapyr with limited phytotoxic effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Five genotypes namely LL699, LL1397, IPL406, EC78452 and LL1203 demonstrated tolerance to imazethapyr with limited phytotoxic effect on various morpho-physiological traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These tolerant genotypes had under 19% seed yield reduction under imazethapyr compared with control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
imazethapyre0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
less reductione0
Value
<19%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“These genotypes showed less reduction (<19%) for seed yield in imazethapyr treated plots as compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1300 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The tolerant genotypes could support development of post emergence herbicide tolerant lentil cultivars.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Outcome
developing post-emergence herbicide tolerant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“These genotypes offer scope for developing post-emergence herbicide tolerant cultivars in lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1398 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.