Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology

Effect of Zinc and Iron Ferti-Fortification on Growth, Pod Yield and Zinc Uptake of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes

V. Sai Surya Gowthami; N. Ananda

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2014–15 at Agronomy field unit, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences (UAS), Raichur to study the effect of zinc and iron ferti-fortification on growth, pod yield and zinc uptake of groundnut genotypes. The soil of the experimental site was deep black, clay in texture with pH 8.4, deficient in DTPA extractable zinc and iron. Three groundnut genotypes in main plots and seven micronutrient treatments comprising of one control and three each of zinc and iron as soil, foliar and both were assigned in the sub-plot in a split-plot design replicated thrice. Results revealed that the groundnut genotype ICGV-00351 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (40.05 cm and 5.40 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (59.29, 130.46 and 189.75 g ha−1, respectively) when compared to other genotypes. Among the micronutrients soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (42.09 cm and 6.30 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (67.42, 153.61 and 221.03 g ha−1, respectively) when compared to other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGV-00351 had higher plant height than other genotypes, reaching 40.05 cm.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material
ICGV-00351e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
40.05 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut genotype ICGV-00351 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (40.05 cm and 5.40 dm2 plant−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–803 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGV-00351 had higher leaf area than other genotypes, reaching 5.40 dm2 plant−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material
ICGV-00351e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.40 dm2 plant−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut genotype ICGV-00351 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (40.05 cm and 5.40 dm2 plant−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–803 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGV-00351 had higher pod yield than other genotypes at 2656 kg ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material
ICGV-00351e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2656 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut genotype ICGV-00351 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (40.05 cm and 5.40 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–829 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGV-00351 had higher kernel zinc uptake, 59.29 g ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material
ICGV-00351e0
Outcome
Zn uptake by kernelse0
Direction
highere0
Value
59.29e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut genotype ICGV-00351 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (40.05 cm and 5.40 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (59.29, 130.46 and 189.75 g ha−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGV-00351 had higher haulm zinc uptake, 130.46 g ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material
ICGV-00351e0
Outcome
Zn uptake by kernels, haulme0
Direction
highere0
Value
130.46e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut genotype ICGV-00351 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (40.05 cm and 5.40 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (59.29, 130.46 and 189.75 g ha−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ICGV-00351 had higher total zinc uptake, 189.75 g ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material
ICGV-00351e0
Outcome
Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and totale0
Direction
highere0
Value
189.75 g ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut genotype ICGV-00351 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (40.05 cm and 5.40 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (59.29, 130.46 and 189.75 g ha−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar ZnSO4 produced higher plant height of 42.09 cm.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.09 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (42.09 cm and 6.30 dm2 plant−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar ZnSO4 produced higher leaf area of 6.30 dm2 plant−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.30 dm2 plant−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (42.09 cm and 6.30 dm2 plant−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar ZnSO4 produced higher pod yield of 2656 kg ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2656 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (42.09 cm and 6.30 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar ZnSO4 produced higher kernel zinc uptake, 67.42 g ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn uptake by kernelse0
Direction
highere0
Value
67.42e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (42.09 cm and 6.30 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (67.42, 153.61 and 221.03 g ha−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar ZnSO4 produced higher haulm zinc uptake, 153.61 g ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn uptake by kernels, haulme0
Direction
highere0
Value
153.61e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (42.09 cm and 6.30 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (67.42, 153.61 and 221.03 g ha−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar ZnSO4 produced higher total zinc uptake, 221.03 g ha−1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and totale0
Direction
highere0
Value
221.03 g ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil (25 kg ha−1) and foliar (0.5%) application of ZnSO4 recorded significantly higher plant height and leaf area at harvest (42.09 cm and 6.30 dm2 plant−1, respectively), pod yield (2656 kg ha−1) and Zn uptake by kernels, haulm and total (67.42, 153.61 and 221.03 g ha−1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–93 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 42 positive, 3 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

application · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 62 positive, 6 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.