Paper · 2003 · Plant Soil and Environment

The effect of sugar beet seed treatments on their vigour

A. Orzeszko-Rywka; S. Podlaski

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Sugar beet seeds of three varieties (Jastra, Jamira, PNMono1) were rubbed, primed, washed and primed after rubbing. All used methods of seed treatment changed pericarp characteristics such as water potential, density, moisture and content of chemicals resulting in electrical conductivity of water extract from the seeds. Seed treatments also improved the ability and rate of germination. Their efficiency was more significant in an excess and shortage of water in germination medium than in optimum water conditions. The lower the initial seed vigour, the larger the vigour improvement. Seed priming had the best effect on the course of germination. Primed seeds were most resistant to different moisture conditions during germination. The largest differences in germination ability after four days in different water conditions were 5.1 and 7.4% for primed and primed after rubbing seeds, respectively, while the difference for control ones was 26.8%. Priming also caused an increase in seed respiration intensity. Rubbing and washing removed chemicals from the pericarp, which resulted in an increase in water potential, and consequently in vigour improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All seed treatments (rubbing, priming, washing, priming after rubbing) changed sugar beet pericarp characteristics such as water potential, density, moisture and chemical content.

Treatment
seed treatmente0
Outcome
pericarp characteristicse0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All used methods of seed treatment changed pericarp characteristics such as water potential, density, moisture and content of chemicals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–251 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments improved the ability and rate of germination of sugar beet seeds.

Treatment
Seed treatmentse0
Outcome
ability and rate of germinatione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatments also improved the ability and rate of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The efficiency of seed treatments was more significant under excess and shortage of water in the germination medium than under optimum water conditions.

Treatment
Seed treatmentse0
Outcome
efficiencye0
Direction
more significante0
Qualifier
excess and shortage of water in germination mediume0
Comparator
optimum water conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatments also improved the ability and rate of germination. Their efficiency was more significant in an excess and shortage of water in germination medium than in optimum water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower the initial sugar beet seed vigour, the larger the vigour improvement.

Treatment
initial seed vigoure0
Outcome
vigour improvemente0
Direction
largere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower the initial seed vigour, the larger the vigour improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming had the best effect on the course of germination of sugar beet seeds.

Treatment
Seed priminge0
Outcome
course of germinatione0
Direction
best effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed priming had the best effect on the course of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed sugar beet seeds were the most resistant to different moisture conditions during germination.

Treatment
Primed seedse0
Outcome
resistant to different moisture conditions during germinatione0
Direction
most resistante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primed seeds were most resistant to different moisture conditions during germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–735 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After four days in different water conditions, the largest difference in germination ability was 5.1% for primed seeds, against 26.8% for control seeds.

Treatment
primede0
Outcome
differences in germination abilitye0
Direction
largest differencese0
Value
5.1e0
Qualifier
26.8%e0
Comparator
control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest differences in germination ability after four days in different water conditions were 5.1 and 7.4% for primed and primed after rubbing seeds, respectively, while the difference for control ones was 26.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After four days in different water conditions, the largest difference in germination ability was 7.4% for seeds primed after rubbing, against 26.8% for control seeds.

Treatment
primed after rubbinge0
Outcome
differences in germination abilitye0
Direction
largest differencese0
Value
7.4%e0
Qualifier
26.8%e0
Comparator
control onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The largest differences in germination ability after four days in different water conditions were 5.1 and 7.4% for primed and primed after rubbing seeds, respectively, while the difference for control ones was 26.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming increased sugar beet seed respiration intensity.

Treatment
Priminge0
Outcome
seed respiration intensitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Priming also caused an increase in seed respiration intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rubbing and washing removed chemicals from the pericarp, which raised water potential and consequently improved vigour.

Treatment
Rubbing and washinge0
Outcome
vigour improvemente0
Qualifier
removed chemicals from the pericarp, which resulted in an increase in water potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rubbing and washing removed chemicals from the pericarp, which resulted in an increase in water potential, and consequently in vigour improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.