Paper · 2018 · Weed Technology

Control of Photosystem II– and 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate Dioxygenase Inhibitor–Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Conventional Corn

Parminder S. Chahal; Suat Irmak; Todd Gaines; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Palmer amaranth, a dioecious summer annual weed species, is the most troublesome weed in agronomic crop production systems in the United States. Palmer amaranth resistant to photosystem (PS) II- and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) inhibitors is of particular concern in south central Nebraska. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of PRE followed by POST herbicide programs on PS II- and HPPD-inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth control, crop yield, and net economic return in conventional corn. A field study was conducted in 2014, 2015, and 2016 in a grower’s field infested with PS II- and HPPD-inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth near Shickley in Fillmore County, Nebraska. A contrast analysis suggested that mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine applied PRE provided 83% Palmer amaranth control at 21 d after application compared to 78 and 72% control with pyroxasulfone+fluthiacet-ethyl+atrazine and saflufenacil+dimethenamid-P, respectively. Most of the PRE followed by POST herbicide programs provided ≥85% Palmer amaranth control. Based on contrast analysis, POST application of dicamba+diflufenzopyr provided 93% Palmer amaranth control compared to 87, 79, and 42% control with dicamba, dicamba+halosulfuron, and acetochlor, respectively, at 28 d after POST. All PRE followed by POST herbicide programs, aside from mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlor (2,530 to 7,809 kg ha −1 ), provided 9,550 to 10,500 kg ha −1 corn yield compared with 2,713 to 6,110 kg ha −1 from nontreated control. Similarly, PRE followed by POST herbicide programs, except for mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlor ($191 and $897 ha −1 ), provided similar net return of $427 to $707 ha −1 and $1,127 to $1,727 ha −1 in 2014 and 2015-16, respectively. It is concluded that herbicide programs based on multiple sites of action are available for control of PS II- and HPPD-inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth in conventional corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE mesotrione combination gave 83% Palmer amaranth control at 21 days.

Treatment
mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine applied PREe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe2weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Value
83%e0
Qualifier
21 d after applicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine applied PRE provided 83% Palmer amaranth control at 21 d after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop yield, and net economic return in conventional corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–536 · show in text ↑
e2

“Palmer amaranth, a dioecious summer annual weed species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most PRE followed by POST programs controlled Palmer amaranth by at least 85%.

Treatment
PRE followed by POST herbicide programse0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Value
≥85%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the PRE followed by POST herbicide programs provided ≥85% Palmer amaranth control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1077 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop yield, and net economic return in conventional corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST dicamba plus diflufenzopyr gave 93% Palmer amaranth control at 28 days.

Treatment
dicamba+diflufenzopyre0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Value
93%e0
Qualifier
at 28 d after POSTe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POST application of dicamba+diflufenzopyr provided 93% Palmer amaranth control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1185 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop yield, and net economic return in conventional corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–536 · show in text ↑
e2

“at 28 d after POST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most PRE followed by POST programs yielded 9,550 to 10,500 kg per hectare of corn versus 2,713 to 6,110 for nontreated controls.

Treatment
PRE followed by POST herbicide programse0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Value
9,550 to 10,500 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
2,713 to 6,110 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All PRE followed by POST herbicide programs, aside from mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlor (2,530 to 7,809 kg ha −1 ), provided 9,550 to 10,500 kg ha −1 corn yield compared with 2,713 to 6,110 kg ha −1 from nontreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mesotrione PRE and acetochlor POST exception yielded 2,530 to 7,809 kg per hectare.

Treatment
mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlore0
Outcome
corn yielde1
Value
2,530 to 7,809 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlor (2,530 to 7,809 kg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1449 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other herbicide programs returned $427 to $707 per hectare in 2014.

Treatment
PRE followed by POST herbicide programse0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
similare0
Value
$427 to $707 ha −1e0
Qualifier
2014e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRE followed by POST herbicide programs, except for mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlor ($191 and $897 ha −1 ), provided similar net return of $427 to $707 ha −1 and $1,127 to $1,727 ha −1 in 2014 and 2015-16, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1815 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop yield, and net economic return in conventional corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other herbicide programs returned $1,127 to $1,727 per hectare in 2015–16.

Treatment
PRE followed by POST herbicide programse0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
similare0
Value
$1,127 to $1,727 ha −1e0
Qualifier
2015-16e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PRE followed by POST herbicide programs, except for mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlor ($191 and $897 ha −1 ), provided similar net return of $427 to $707 ha −1 and $1,127 to $1,727 ha −1 in 2014 and 2015-16, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1815 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop yield, and net economic return in conventional corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mesotrione and acetochlor program returned $191 and $897 per hectare across the reported years.

Treatment
mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlore0
Outcome
net returne1
Value
$191 and $897 ha −1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mesotrione+ S -metolachlor+atrazine followed by acetochlor ($191 and $897 ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1703 · show in text ↑
e1

“net return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1732 · show in text ↑
e2

“crop yield, and net economic return in conventional corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–536 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that multiple site herbicide programs are available to control resistant Palmer amaranth in corn.

Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
herbicide programs based on multiple sites of actione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide programs based on multiple sites of action are available for control of PS II- and HPPD-inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth in conventional corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–1992 · show in text ↑

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Adding atrazine to PRE herbicides increased corn yields by 8%.

    A Rationale for Atrazine Stewardship in Corn · 2007 · compared with PRE herbicides

    Same directionCited by this paper

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.