Paper · 2018 · Plant Production Science

Effect of plant density on growth and yield of new soybean genotypes grown under early planting condition in southwestern Japan

Naoki Matsuo; Tetsuya Yamada; Yoshitake Takada; et al.

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soybeans planted in early to mid-June (early) are less affected by rainfall during rainy season than those conventionally planted in early to mid-July in southwestern Japan. Also, narrow row cultivation is expected to increase soybean yield and save labor for inter-tillage and ridging. Field experiments were performed in 2014 and 2015 to test the effect of plant density (high, middle, and low) under early planting condition on growth, yield, and several agronomical traits of Sachiyutaka A1 and three new genotypes (Sakukei 155, Kanto 127 and Shikoku 15). Early planting was performed in mid- to late June, even though rainy season started in early June. Higher plant densities produced 13% greater yield than low plant density through an increase in biomass accumulation, especially at R5. Among yield components, only pods m−2 was significantly and positively correlated with yield, indicating that an increase in pods m−2 led to a greater yield with higher plant densities. The yields of Sachiyutaka A1 were relatively stable for two years, but the lodging resistance should be further improved. Shikoku 15 had greater yield potential and lodging resistance, but its resistance to damping-off disease should be improved. Sakukei 155 with medium plant density produced relatively high and stable yield with less lodging. Although the yield of Kanto 127 fluctuated between experimental years, this genotype showed higher yield potential in higher plant densities with less lodging in 2015. Thus, Sakukei 155 and Kanto 127 with high or medium density may be suitable for early planting in this region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased soybean yield by 13% versus low density.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
Higher plant densitiese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
low plant densitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant densities produced 13% greater yield than low plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher density increased biomass accumulation, especially at R5.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R5e0
Treatment
Higher plant densitiese1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
low plant densitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“through an increase in biomass accumulation, especially at R5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher plant densities produced 13% greater yield than low plant density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods per square meter was the only yield component significantly positively correlated with yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
pods m−2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only pods m−2 was significantly and positively correlated with yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sachiyutaka A1 yield was relatively stable over two years.

Taxon
Sachiyutaka A1e0
Material
Sachiyutaka A1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Qualifier
relatively stable for two yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“The yields of Sachiyutaka A1 were relatively stable for two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shikoku 15 had greater yield potential and lodging resistance.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Shikoku 15e0
Outcome
yield potential and lodging resistancee0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shikoku 15 had greater yield potential and lodging resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakukei 155 at medium density produced relatively high and stable yield with less lodging.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Sakukei 155e0
Treatment
medium plant densitye0
Outcome
yield with less lodginge0
Direction
relatively highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakukei 155 with medium plant density produced relatively high and stable yield with less lodging.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kanto 127 yield fluctuated across years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Kanto 127e0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
fluctuated between experimental yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of Kanto 127 fluctuated between experimental years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kanto 127 showed higher yield potential at higher density with less lodging in 2015.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
Kanto 127e1
Treatment
higher plant densitiese0
Outcome
yield potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
less lodging in 2015e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this genotype showed higher yield potential in higher plant densities with less lodging in 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“Kanto 127 fluctuated between experimental years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend improving lodging resistance in Sachiyutaka A1.

Taxon
Sachiyutaka A1e1
Outcome
lodging resistancee0

Verbatim

e0

“the lodging resistance should be further improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sachiyutaka A1 were relatively stable for two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1046 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend improving damping-off resistance in Shikoku 15.

Taxon
Shikoku 15e1
Outcome
resistance to damping-off diseasee0

Verbatim

e0

“its resistance to damping-off disease should be improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1226 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shikoku 15 had greater yield potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1141 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider Sakukei 155 at high or medium density suitable for early planting.

Taxon
Sakukei 155e0
Treatment
high or medium densitye0
Outcome
suitable for early plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Sakukei 155 and Kanto 127 with high or medium density may be suitable for early planting in this region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1605 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider Kanto 127 at high or medium density suitable for early planting.

Taxon
Kanto 127e0
Treatment
high or medium densitye0
Outcome
suitable for early plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Sakukei 155 and Kanto 127 with high or medium density may be suitable for early planting in this region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1605 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 59 positive, 23 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 207 positive, 98 negative or no effect

206 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.