Paper · 2018 · Pest Management Science

Herbicide resistance evolution can be tamed by diversity in irrigated Australian cotton: a multi‐species, multi‐herbicide modelling approach

David Thornby; Jeff Werth; James Hereward; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Because herbicide resistance evolves in very large populations over periods of many years, modelling is an important tool for investigating the dynamics of the problem. The Diversity model tracks the simultaneous evolution of resistance to multiple herbicides, using multiple genetic pathways, in several weed species at once. Tracking multiple species and simultaneous resistances is an important development in resistance modelling. We used the Diversity model to test weed management strategies for new cropping cotton varieties with multiple herbicide tolerances (‘triple‐stacked’ varieties), in an Australian context. RESULTS The diversity required for long‐term control of three key weeds in Australian cotton goes beyond using three herbicides, especially where there is already a substantial background of existing resistance to one or more of these herbicides. Assuming some glyphosate resistance is already present, simulations showed that glyphosate‐resistant summer grass populations reach 20 000 seeds m −2 within 12 years using the triple‐stack herbicides (glyphosate, glufosinate and dicamba) and a minimum of other tactics. Adding three pre‐emergent modes of action plus cultivation to the system effectively controls glyphosate‐resistant grasses for over 30 years. In conditions where resistance genes are as frequent as 1 in 100, however, highly fecund weeds such as Conyza bonariensis are hard to control beyond 15 years even with very highly diverse management. CONCLUSIONS Stacked herbicide tolerances in new crop varieties offers potential for increased herbicide diversity, but existing glyphosate‐resistant weed populations need substantial extra management beyond what a glyphosate/glufosinate/dicamba resistance stack provides. More diverse systems can provide robust management over 30 years in the absence of very high levels of background resistance to other herbicides. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate-resistant summer grass populations reach 20 000 seeds m −2 within 12 years under triple-stack herbicides and a minimum of other tactics.

Treatment
herbicides (glyphosate, glufosinate and dicamba)e2
Interactor
summer grasse1weed
Outcome
summer grass populationse1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
20 000 seeds m −2e1
Qualifier
within 12 yearse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We used the Diversity model to test weed management strategies for new cropping cotton varieties with multiple herbicide tolerances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer grass populations reach 20 000 seeds m −2 within 12 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1055 · show in text ↑
e2

“herbicides (glyphosate, glufosinate and dicamba) and a minimum of other tactics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated pre-emergent modes of action plus cultivation effectively control glyphosate-resistant grasses for over 30 years in cotton.

Treatment
modes of action plus cultivatione4
Interactor
grassese3weed
Outcome
grassese3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Qualifier
for over 30 yearse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We used the Diversity model to test weed management strategies for new cropping cotton varieties with multiple herbicide tolerances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–586 · show in text ↑
e3

“grasses for over 30 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1300 · show in text ↑
e4

“modes of action plus cultivation to the system effectively controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations with resistance genes as frequent as 1 in 100, Conyza bonariensis is hard to control beyond 15 years in cotton even with very highly diverse management.

Interactor
Conyza bonariensisConyza bonariensise5weed
Outcome
Conyza bonariensis are hard to control beyond 15 yearse5
Qualifier
even with very highly diverse managemente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conyza bonariensis
Conyza bonariensis · InteractorJosep Gesti · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We used the Diversity model to test weed management strategies for new cropping cotton varieties with multiple herbicide tolerances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–586 · show in text ↑
e5

“highly fecund weeds such as Conyza bonariensis are hard to control beyond 15 years even with very highly diverse management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1500 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Management of three key weeds in Australian cotton needs more diversity than three herbicides.

Outcome
control of three key weedse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“control of three key weeds in Australian cotton goes beyond using three herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–770 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More diverse systems can provide robust management of resistant weeds in cotton over 30 years when background resistance to other herbicides is low.

Outcome
robust management over 30 yearse7
Qualifier
in the absence of very high levels of background resistance to other herbicidese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We used the Diversity model to test weed management strategies for new cropping cotton varieties with multiple herbicide tolerances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–586 · show in text ↑
e7

“More diverse systems can provide robust management over 30 years in the absence of very high levels of background resistance to other herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1918 · show in text ↑

dicamba · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

glyphosate · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

glufosinate · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.