Paper · 2017 · KnE Life Sciences

Effect of Mulch on the Growth and Yield of Polianthes tuberosa

Donald Sihombing; Wahyu Handayati

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tuberose is one of the most important ornamental plants in Indonesia which the demand continuously increases. However, tuberose is commonly cultivated in drained rice fields and this resulted in various problem such us weed and insect infestation especially mealybug in dry season. In this regard a study was conducted in Malang Regency at Karangploso Experimental Station of East Java Assessment Institute for Agriculture Technology from March 2012 to April 2013. The study employed an experimental method using a randomized block design. Two varieties of tuberoses, i.e., Dian Arum (double flowering) and Roro Anteng (semi-double flowering) were planted on a prepared soil bed. Both tuberose varieties were treated by a silvery plastic mulch cover on one bed and none on the other. Results showed significant differences between the mulch and without mulch treatments in terms of plant growth and flower production. Flower production obtained from mulch treatment was 3.8 stalks/clump or 34.22 stalks/m2, whereas that without mulch was 2.47 stalks/clump or 27.44 stalks/m2. Meanwhile the damage intensity caused by mealybug infestation on the mulch treatment was 15.21%, while that without mulch was 22.17%. In fact, the use of mulch could reduce the weeding cost up to 66.67 % and the total production cost up to 20.86%. The result obtained from R/C ratio analysis with mulch treatment was 2.59 whereas that without mulch was 1.71.Keywords: Polianthes tuberosa ; mulch; weed, pest; yield; R/C ratio

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch significantly affected plant growth.

Taxon
Polianthes tuberosaAgave amicat0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Comparator
without mulche0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed significant differences between the mulch and without mulch treatments in terms of plant growth and flower production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polianthes tuberosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased flower production to 3.8 stalks/clump versus 2.47 without mulch.

Taxon
Polianthes tuberosaAgave amicat0
Treatment
mulch treatmente0
Outcome
Flower productione0
Value
3.8 stalks/clumpe0
Qualifier
2.47 stalks/clumpe0
Comparator
without mulche0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower production obtained from mulch treatment was 3.8 stalks/clump or 34.22 stalks/m2, whereas that without mulch was 2.47 stalks/clump or 27.44 stalks/m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polianthes tuberosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased flower production per square metre to 34.22 stalks/m2 versus 27.44 without mulch.

Taxon
Polianthes tuberosaAgave amicat0
Treatment
mulch treatmente0
Outcome
Flower productione0
Value
34.22 stalks/m2e0
Qualifier
27.44 stalks/m2e0
Comparator
without mulche0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower production obtained from mulch treatment was 3.8 stalks/clump or 34.22 stalks/m2, whereas that without mulch was 2.47 stalks/clump or 27.44 stalks/m2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polianthes tuberosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch reduced mealybug damage intensity to 15.21% versus 22.17% without mulch.

Taxon
Polianthes tuberosaAgave amicat0
Treatment
mulch treatmente0
Interactor
mealybuge0pest
Outcome
damage intensity caused by mealybug infestatione0
Value
15.21%e0
Qualifier
22.17%e0
Comparator
without mulche0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the damage intensity caused by mealybug infestation on the mulch treatment was 15.21%, while that without mulch was 22.17%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polianthes tuberosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch reduced weeding cost by up to 66.67%.

Taxon
Polianthes tuberosaAgave amicat0
Treatment
mulche0
Outcome
weeding coste0
Direction
reducee0
Value
66.67 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of mulch could reduce the weeding cost up to 66.67 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polianthes tuberosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch reduced total production cost by up to 20.86%.

Taxon
Polianthes tuberosaAgave amicat0
Treatment
Mulcht0
Outcome
total production coste0
Value
20.86%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total production cost up to 20.86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulch on the Growth and Yield of Polianthes tuberosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The R/C ratio was 2.59 with mulch versus 1.71 without mulch.

Taxon
Polianthes tuberosaAgave amicat0
Treatment
mulch treatmente0
Outcome
R/C ratioe0
Value
2.59e0
Qualifier
1.71e0
Comparator
without mulche0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agave amica
Agave amica · TaxonSKsiddhartthan · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R/C ratio analysis with mulch treatment was 2.59 whereas that without mulch was 1.71”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Polianthes tuberosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–62 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.