Paper · 2018 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Effect of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber grown under protected cultivation

Jaydeep Patil; S. R. Goel; Saroj Yadav

15
claims
36
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber grown in the polyhouse under protected conditions. The experiment was conducted in pots to evaluate the effect of nematode and fungus individually as well as in various sequential combinations i.e. simultaneous inoculation of nematode and fungus (SIS), nematode one week prior to fungus (1WBF) and nematode one week after fungus (1WAF). The results revealed that nematode inoculation caused significantly more reduction in plant growth parameter, viz., shoot length (SL), root length (RL), fresh shoot weight (FSW), fresh root weight (FRW), dry shoot weight (DSW) and dry root weight (DRW) of cucumber as a comparison to fungus alone, however, combined inoculation of the nematode and fungus was statistically significant with respect to reduction in plant growth parameter over their individual effect. Maximum and significantly more reduction in plant growth parameters viz., SL (125.5cm), RL (32.0cm), FSW (44.0g), FRW (24.3g), SDW (8.5g) and DRW (4.1g) was observed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week before fungus as compares to an untreated check having SL (138.2), RL (47.5), FSW (58.5), FRW (37.5), SDW (21.5), and DRW (9.4). Nematode reproduction in terms of formation of galls and egg masses and final nematode population in soil was also significantly suppressed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week prior to fungus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation reduced cucumber shoot length more than fungus alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
nematode inoculatione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinumt0pathogen
Outcome
shoot length (SL)e0
Direction
more reductione0
Comparator
fungus alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode inoculation caused significantly more reduction in plant growth parameter, viz., shoot length (SL), root length (RL), fresh shoot weight (FSW), fresh root weight (FRW), dry shoot weight (DSW) and dry root weight (DRW) of cucumber as a comparison to fungus alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation reduced cucumber root length more than fungus alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
nematode inoculatione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
root length (RL)e0
Direction
more reductione0
Comparator
fungus alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode inoculation caused significantly more reduction in plant growth parameter, viz., shoot length (SL), root length (RL), fresh shoot weight (FSW), fresh root weight (FRW), dry shoot weight (DSW) and dry root weight (DRW) of cucumber as a comparison to fungus alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation reduced cucumber fresh shoot weight more than fungus alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
nematode inoculatione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
fresh shoot weight (FSW)e0
Direction
more reductione0
Comparator
fungus alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode inoculation caused significantly more reduction in plant growth parameter, viz., shoot length (SL), root length (RL), fresh shoot weight (FSW), fresh root weight (FRW), dry shoot weight (DSW) and dry root weight (DRW) of cucumber as a comparison to fungus alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation reduced cucumber fresh root weight more than fungus alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
nematode inoculatione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
fresh root weight (FRW)e0
Direction
more reductione0
Comparator
fungus alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode inoculation caused significantly more reduction in plant growth parameter, viz., shoot length (SL), root length (RL), fresh shoot weight (FSW), fresh root weight (FRW), dry shoot weight (DSW) and dry root weight (DRW) of cucumber as a comparison to fungus alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation reduced cucumber dry shoot and root weight more than fungus alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
nematode inoculatione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
dry shoot weight (DSW) and dry root weight (DRW)e0
Direction
more reductione0
Comparator
fungus alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode inoculation caused significantly more reduction in plant growth parameter, viz., shoot length (SL), root length (RL), fresh shoot weight (FSW), fresh root weight (FRW), dry shoot weight (DSW) and dry root weight (DRW) of cucumber as a comparison to fungus alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation significantly reduced cucumber growth more than either organism alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
combined inoculation of the nematode and funguse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinumt0pathogen
Outcome
plant growth parametere0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
their individual effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined inoculation of the nematode and fungus was statistically significant with respect to reduction in plant growth parameter over their individual effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation one week before fungus gave the greatest shoot length reduction, with 125.5cm versus 138.2 in the check.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week before funguse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinumFusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinumt0pathogen
Outcome
SLe0
Direction
reductione1
Value
125.5cme0
Qualifier
138.2e0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SL (125.5cm), RL (32.0cm), FSW (44.0g), FRW (24.3g), SDW (8.5g) and DRW (4.1g) was observed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week before fungus as compares to an untreated check having SL (138.2), RL (47.5), FSW (58.5), FRW (37.5), SDW (21.5), and DRW (9.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum and significantly more reduction in plant growth parameters viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence gave root length of 32.0cm versus 47.5 in the check.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week before funguse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
RLe0
Direction
reductione1
Value
32.0cme0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RL (32.0cm), FSW (44.0g), FRW (24.3g), SDW (8.5g) and DRW (4.1g) was observed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week before fungus as compares to an untreated check having SL (138.2), RL (47.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum and significantly more reduction in plant growth parameters viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence gave fresh shoot weight of 44.0g versus 58.5 in the check.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week before funguse0
Outcome
FSWe0
Direction
reductione1
Value
44.0ge0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FSW (44.0g), FRW (24.3g), SDW (8.5g) and DRW (4.1g) was observed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week before fungus as compares to an untreated check having SL (138.2), RL (47.5), FSW (58.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum and significantly more reduction in plant growth parameters viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence gave fresh root weight of 24.3g versus 37.5 in the check.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week before funguse0
Outcome
FRWe0
Direction
reductione1
Value
24.3ge0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FRW (24.3g), SDW (8.5g) and DRW (4.1g) was observed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week before fungus as compares to an untreated check having SL (138.2), RL (47.5), FSW (58.5), FRW (37.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum and significantly more reduction in plant growth parameters viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence gave shoot dry weight of 8.5g versus 21.5 in the check.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week before funguse0
Outcome
SDWe0
Direction
reductione1
Value
8.5ge0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SDW (8.5g) and DRW (4.1g) was observed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week before fungus as compares to an untreated check having SL (138.2), RL (47.5), FSW (58.5), FRW (37.5), SDW (21.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum and significantly more reduction in plant growth parameters viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same sequence gave dry root weight of 4.1g versus 9.4 in the check.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week before funguse0
Outcome
DRWe0
Direction
reductione1
Value
4.1ge0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DRW (4.1g) was observed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week before fungus as compares to an untreated check having SL (138.2), RL (47.5), FSW (58.5), FRW (37.5), SDW (21.5), and DRW (9.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum and significantly more reduction in plant growth parameters viz.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation before fungus suppressed gall formation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week prior to funguse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
Nematode reproduction in terms of formation of gallse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode reproduction in terms of formation of galls and egg masses and final nematode population in soil was also significantly suppressed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week prior to fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation before fungus suppressed egg mass formation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week prior to funguse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
egg massese0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode reproduction in terms of formation of galls and egg masses and final nematode population in soil was also significantly suppressed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week prior to fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation before fungus suppressed final nematode population in soil.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
nematode was inoculated one week prior to funguse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
final nematode population in soile0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode reproduction in terms of formation of galls and egg masses and final nematode population in soil was also significantly suppressed in the treatment where nematode was inoculated one week prior to fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum on cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–85 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 109 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 109 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.