Paper · 2018 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Fertilizer responsiveness of short duration improved finger millet genotypes to different levels of NPK fertilizers

U. Triveni; Y. Sandhya Rani; T.S. S.K. Patro; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at Agricultural Research Station, Vizianagaram, during Kharif, 2016 under rainfed conditions to know the fertilizer responsiveness of promising finger millet varieties to graded doses of NPK fertilizers. Twenty treatment combinations were tested in split- plot design with three replications. Experimental results revealed that with 125% RDF grain yield increase was 10%, 27% and 48% higher than 100% RDF, 75% RDF and 50% RDF respectively. Among the finger millet genotypes, grain yield of VL-379(2037 kg/ha) and VL-352(1989 kg/ha) was significantly high and was at par with national check variety VR-708(1959 kg/ha). Both the test varieties (VL-379 and VL-352) were far superior to local check variety in terms of growth and yield characteristics. Higher net monetary returns and B:C ratio were obtained with VL-379, followed by VR-708 and VL-352 at 125% RDF.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF gave 10% higher grain yield than 100% RDF.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
125% RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
100% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with 125% RDF grain yield increase was 10%, 27% and 48% higher than 100% RDF, 75% RDF and 50% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF gave 27% higher grain yield than 75% RDF.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
125% RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27%e0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with 125% RDF grain yield increase was 10%, 27% and 48% higher than 100% RDF, 75% RDF and 50% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF gave 48% higher grain yield than 50% RDF.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
125% RDFe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
48%e0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with 125% RDF grain yield increase was 10%, 27% and 48% higher than 100% RDF, 75% RDF and 50% RDF respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-379 yielded 2037 kg/ha, significantly high and at par with VR-708.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-379e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
2037 kg/hae0
Comparator
VR-708e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of VL-379(2037 kg/ha) and VL-352(1989 kg/ha) was significantly high and was at par with national check variety VR-708(1959 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-352 yielded 1989 kg/ha, significantly high and at par with VR-708.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-352e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
1989 kg/hae0
Comparator
VR-708e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield of VL-379(2037 kg/ha) and VL-352(1989 kg/ha) was significantly high and was at par with national check variety VR-708(1959 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-379 exceeded the local check in growth and yield characteristics.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-379e0
Outcome
growth and yield characteristicse0
Direction
far superiore0
Comparator
local check varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the test varieties (VL-379 and VL-352) were far superior to local check variety in terms of growth and yield characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-352 exceeded the local check in growth and yield characteristics.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-352e0
Outcome
growth and yield characteristicse0
Direction
far superiore0
Comparator
local check varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the test varieties (VL-379 and VL-352) were far superior to local check variety in terms of growth and yield characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VL-379 had the highest net returns and B:C ratio at 125% RDF, followed by VR-708 and VL-352.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Material
VL-379e0
Outcome
net monetary returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
at 125% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher net monetary returns and B:C ratio were obtained with VL-379, followed by VR-708 and VL-352 at 125% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–66 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.