Paper · 2018 · Plant and Soil

Microorganisms reveal what plants do not: wheat growth and rhizosphere microbial communities after Azospirillum brasilense inoculation and nitrogen fertilization under field conditions

Luciana P. Di Salvo; Lucía Ferrando; Ana Fernández-Scavino; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Azospirillum brasilense is one of plant growth promoting bacteria used to improve plant growth and grain yield of cereal crops. The level of inoculation response is defined by complex plant-microorganism interactions, many of them still unknown. Thus, we evaluated both agronomic response and microbial ecology of wheat crop under A. brasilense inoculation and nitrogen fertilization at field conditions in order to improve inoculation efficiency. Treatments were: control, nitrogen fertilization and inoculation with 40M and 42M strains. Functional and structural diversity of rhizosphere bacterial communities were evaluated by community-level physiological and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiles. Besides, aerial biomass, grain yield and counts of microaerophilic diazotrophic rhizobacteria were determined. Plant ontogeny modified the number of culturable microaerophilic diazotrophic rhizobacteria. Although agronomic response did not show differences, plant ontogeny and the agricultural practices modified both physiology and genetic structure of rhizosphere microbial communities. Interestingly, these differences due to the treatments were observed at jointing stage but not at grain-filling stage of wheat. Our results demonstrate how different management decisions can change plant- microorganism relationships. While wheat could not show differences between some agricultural treatments, under the soil surface microbial communities could show them.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with A. brasilense strains 40M and 42M, or nitrogen fertilization, did not change the agronomic response of field wheat compared with control.

Treatment
inoculation with 40M and 42M strainse1
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee2symbiont
Outcome
agronomic responsee0
Direction
did not show differencese0
Comparator
controle1
Setting
field conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although agronomic response did not show differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments were: control, nitrogen fertilization and inoculation with 40M and 42M strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–537 · show in text ↑
e2

“we evaluated both agronomic response and microbial ecology of wheat crop under A. brasilense inoculation and nitrogen fertilization at field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–403 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant ontogeny modified the number of culturable microaerophilic diazotrophic rhizobacteria in the wheat rhizosphere.

Treatment
Plant ontogenye3
Interactor
diazotrophic rhizobacteriae3symbiont
Outcome
number of culturable microaerophilic diazotrophic rhizobacteriae3
Direction
modifiede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“we evaluated both agronomic response and microbial ecology of wheat crop under A. brasilense inoculation and nitrogen fertilization at field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–403 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant ontogeny modified the number of culturable microaerophilic diazotrophic rhizobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–926 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant ontogeny and agricultural practices modified both physiology and genetic structure of rhizosphere microbial communities of wheat.

Treatment
agricultural practicese4
Interactor
rhizosphere microbial communitiese4symbiont
Outcome
physiology and genetic structure of rhizosphere microbial communitiese4
Direction
modifiede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“we evaluated both agronomic response and microbial ecology of wheat crop under A. brasilense inoculation and nitrogen fertilization at field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–403 · show in text ↑
e4

“plant ontogeny and the agricultural practices modified both physiology and genetic structure of rhizosphere microbial communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in rhizosphere microbial communities due to the treatments were observed at jointing stage but not at grain-filling stage of wheat.

Organ / stage
jointing stagee5
Outcome
differences due to the treatmentse5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“these differences due to the treatments were observed at jointing stage but not at grain-filling stage of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1239 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Azospirillum brasilense · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.