Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Genetic variability and correlation studies in grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) in Leh District of Jammu and Kashmir

Dolkar, T.; Sharma, M.K.; Kumar, A.; et al.

20
claims
43
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The present investigations on genetic variability and correlation in wild grape accessions were carried out in the most favourable regions of Leh district of Jammu and Kashmir. Fifty wild grape accessions from five different villages of the district were marked and evaluated for important morphological traits i.e. yield and quality parameters. Data on various vegetative, fruit physical and fruit chemical characters were taken. Significant variations were observed for all the characters studied except number of seeds per berry. High genotypic coefficient of variance (GCV) and phenotypic coefficient of variance (PCV) were recorded for yield (21.73 and 22.81), yield efficiency (41.19 and 52.73), bunch weight (21.07 and 21.23), number of berries per bunch (22.31 and 25.28), berry length (21.69 and 22.07), berry weight (21.13 and 21.28) and total sugars (22.69 and 22.70). Out of twenty studied characters, thirteen characters registered high heritability estimates, while five recorded moderate heritability estimates and number of seeds per berry and acidity showed low heritability estimates. However, cane length (59.40), leaf area (31.43), bunch weight (43.16), number of berries per bunch (27.18) and TSS/acid ratio (25.81) exhibited high genetic advance as percentage of mean indicating additive gene effect. Fruit or berry yield was positively and significantly correlated with bunch length (0.652), bunch breadth (0.584), bunch weight (0.946), number of berries per bunch (0.672), berry breadth (0.363) and number of seeds per berry (0.612). This study revealed that the characters such as yield, bunch length, bunch weight, number of bunch per vine, berry weight, number of berries per bunch, total soluble solids and total sugars are the most important traits for selecting best grape accessions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All studied grape characters except seed number per berry varied significantly.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
variationse0
Qualifier
except number of seeds per berrye0

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variations were observed for all the characters studied except number of seeds per berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed number per berry did not show significant variation.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
number of seeds per berrye0

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variations were observed for all the characters studied except number of seeds per berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield had high GCV and PCV of 21.73 and 22.81.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
genotypic coefficient of variance (GCV) and phenotypic coefficient of variance (PCV)e0
Value
21.73 and 22.81e0

Verbatim

e0

“High genotypic coefficient of variance (GCV) and phenotypic coefficient of variance (PCV) were recorded for yield (21.73 and 22.81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield efficiency had high GCV and PCV of 41.19 and 52.73.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
yield efficiencye0
Value
41.19 and 52.73e0

Verbatim

e0

“yield efficiency (41.19 and 52.73)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–700 · show in text ↑
e1

“High genotypic coefficient of variance (GCV) and phenotypic coefficient of variance (PCV) were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunch weight had high GCV and PCV of 21.07 and 21.23.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Value
21.07 and 21.23e0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch weight (21.07 and 21.23)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of berries per bunch had high GCV and PCV of 22.31 and 25.28.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
number of berries per bunche0
Value
22.31 and 25.28e0

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries per bunch (22.31 and 25.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry length had high GCV and PCV of 21.69 and 22.07.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
berry lengthe0
Value
21.69 and 22.07e0

Verbatim

e0

“berry length (21.69 and 22.07)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry weight had high GCV and PCV of 21.13 and 21.28.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
berry weighte0
Value
21.13 and 21.28e0

Verbatim

e0

“berry weight (21.13 and 21.28)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugars had high GCV and PCV of 22.69 and 22.70.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
total sugarse0
Value
22.69 and 22.70e0

Verbatim

e0

“total sugars (22.69 and 22.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirteen characters had high heritability estimates.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
high heritability estimatese0
Value
thirteene0

Verbatim

e0

“thirteen characters registered high heritability estimates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five characters had moderate heritability estimates.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
moderate heritability estimatese0
Value
fivee0

Verbatim

e0

“five recorded moderate heritability estimates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed number and acidity had low heritability.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
low heritability estimatese0

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds per berry and acidity showed low heritability estimates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane length had high genetic advance of 59.40 percent of mean.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
cane lengthe0
Value
59.40e0

Verbatim

e0

“cane length (59.40)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“exhibited high genetic advance as percentage of mean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area had high genetic advance of 31.43 percent of mean.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Value
31.43e0

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (31.43)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1150 · show in text ↑
e1

“exhibited high genetic advance as percentage of mean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bunch weight had high genetic advance of 43.16 percent of mean.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
bunch weighte0
Value
43.16e0

Verbatim

e0

“bunch weight (43.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry count per bunch had high genetic advance of 27.18 percent of mean.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
number of berries per bunche0
Value
27.18e0

Verbatim

e0

“number of berries per bunch (27.18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS/acid ratio had high genetic advance of 25.81 percent of mean.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
TSS/acid ratioe0
Value
25.81e0

Verbatim

e0

“TSS/acid ratio (25.81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield correlated positively and significantly with bunch length, breadth and weight.

Taxon
grapest0
Organ / stage
bunche0
Outcome
Fruit or berry yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit or berry yield was positively and significantly correlated with bunch length (0.652), bunch breadth (0.584), bunch weight (0.946)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1458 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield correlated positively and significantly with berry count, breadth and seed count.

Taxon
grapest0
Organ / stage
berrye0
Outcome
Fruit or berry yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit or berry yield was positively and significantly correlated with bunch length (0.652), bunch breadth (0.584), bunch weight (0.946), number of berries per bunch (0.672), berry breadth (0.363) and number of seeds per berry (0.612)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified yield, bunch and berry traits, soluble solids and sugars as selection traits.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
most important traits for selecting best grape accessionse0

Verbatim

e0

“the characters such as yield, bunch length, bunch weight, number of bunch per vine, berry weight, number of berries per bunch, total soluble solids and total sugars are the most important traits for selecting best grape accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1813 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–53 · show in text ↑