Paper · 2017 · Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara)

Ozone and electrolized water application to preserve quality of citrus fruit and effect of ozone on gene expression related to plant defense mechanisms

DAMARA, EYAD

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

In this work the effect of ozone (O3), electrolyzed water (EW) in combination with passive refrigeration conservation system (PRS) on fruit quality was studied during postharvest. The amount of Colony Forming Units (CFUs) on fruit surface, shelf life (McKinney index), firmness and sugar content were evaluated during the conservation period of Citrus (cv. Navel orange and cv. Clementine commune), cherry (cv. Ferrovia) and table grape (cv. Redglobe, Crimson and Italia). O3 and EW dose and exposure time were set in in vitro experiment. O3 was used in washing water or as gas during storage. Results demonstrate that the combination of O3, EW and PRS treatments reduce microorganism contamination and increase fruits hardness and sugar content. An extension of fruit shelf-life was also evidenced. Elicitors are agents that can induce a range of defense mechanisms in citrus tissue. This characteristic results in a broad spectrum of metabolic modifications such as Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR), Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) and production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). In the present study we investigated the expression level of genes that encode Beta-1,3 glucanase (GNS1), Chitinase (CHI1), Phenylalanine-Ammonia Lyase (PAL1) and Peroxidase (POD1) in Navel sweet orange treated with two elicitors: ozone and Penicillium digitatum. Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR (qRTPCR) showed that ozone applied singly increased the transcription of (GNS1) and (CHI1) with a fold change of 22 and 21 above the levels observed for the control at 24 hours and 48 hours after treatment. Unexpectedly, P.digitatum inoculation followed by ozone treatment was weakly effective in enhancing the tested genes. Overall, we consider that ozone can enhance the genes related to SAR (CHI1 and GNS1) in non-inoculated fruits. Therefore, ozone can be used as post-harvest treatment immediately after picking, before the exposure of fruits to pathogens. This lead to suggest fruit washing with EW storing in PRS under ozonized atmosphere, to counteract a pathogenic attack or in general a stress event.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatments reduced fruit microorganism contamination.

Taxon
CitrusCitruse1
Treatment
combination of O3, EW and PRS treatmentse0
Outcome
microorganism contaminatione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results demonstrate that the combination of O3, EW and PRS treatments reduce microorganism contamination and increase fruits hardness and sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“Citrus (cv. Navel orange and cv. Clementine commune), cherry (cv. Ferrovia) and table grape (cv. Redglobe, Crimson and Italia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatments increased fruit hardness.

Taxon
CitrusCitruse1
Treatment
combination of O3, EW and PRS treatmentse0
Outcome
fruits hardnesse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results demonstrate that the combination of O3, EW and PRS treatments reduce microorganism contamination and increase fruits hardness and sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“Citrus (cv. Navel orange and cv. Clementine commune), cherry (cv. Ferrovia) and table grape (cv. Redglobe, Crimson and Italia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatments increased fruit sugar content.

Taxon
CitrusCitruse1
Treatment
combination of O3, EW and PRS treatmentse0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results demonstrate that the combination of O3, EW and PRS treatments reduce microorganism contamination and increase fruits hardness and sugar content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“Citrus (cv. Navel orange and cv. Clementine commune), cherry (cv. Ferrovia) and table grape (cv. Redglobe, Crimson and Italia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments extended fruit shelf life.

Taxon
CitrusCitruse2
Treatment
O3, EW and PRS treatmentse1
Outcome
fruit shelf-lifee0
Direction
extensione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An extension of fruit shelf-life was also evidenced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“O3, EW and PRS treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–663 · show in text ↑
e2

“Citrus (cv. Navel orange and cv. Clementine commune), cherry (cv. Ferrovia) and table grape (cv. Redglobe, Crimson and Italia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone alone increased GNS1 transcription 22 fold above control.

Taxon
Navel sweet orangee1
Treatment
ozonee0
Gene
GNS1e0
Outcome
transcription of (GNS1)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“ozone applied singly increased the transcription of (GNS1) and (CHI1) with a fold change of 22 and 21 above the levels observed for the control at 24 hours and 48 hours after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“Navel sweet orange treated with two elicitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone alone increased CHI1 transcription 21 fold above control.

Taxon
Navel sweet orangee1
Treatment
ozonee0
Gene
CHI1e0
Outcome
transcription of (GNS1) and (CHI1)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“ozone applied singly increased the transcription of (GNS1) and (CHI1) with a fold change of 22 and 21 above the levels observed for the control at 24 hours and 48 hours after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“Navel sweet orange treated with two elicitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pathogen inoculation followed by ozone weakly enhanced the tested genes.

Taxon
Navel sweet orangee1
Treatment
P.digitatum inoculation followed by ozone treatmente0
Interactor
P.digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
the tested genese0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P.digitatum inoculation followed by ozone treatment was weakly effective in enhancing the tested genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1714 · show in text ↑
e1

“Navel sweet orange treated with two elicitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1316 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest washing fruit with EW and storing in PRS under ozone.

Taxon
CitrusCitruse1
Outcome
fruit washing with EW storing in PRS under ozonized atmospheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This lead to suggest fruit washing with EW storing in PRS under ozonized atmosphere, to counteract a pathogenic attack or in general a stress event.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1952–2100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Citrus (cv. Navel orange and cv. Clementine commune), cherry (cv. Ferrovia) and table grape (cv. Redglobe, Crimson and Italia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–471 · show in text ↑

ozone · quality: postharvest · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.