Paper · 2017 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Variety × Nutrient management interaction in greengram for important yield attributes under rainfed red lateritic inceptisol

Ashok Mishra; B. S. Rath; S. K. Mukhi; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of five nutrient management practices on the yield and yield attributes, nutrient uptake and rain water use efficiency in four greengram varieties (Dhauli, Pusa-9531, OBGG-52 and Nayagarh Local) in rainfed upland inceptisol with sandy- loam soil was studied in factorial RBD with three replications during Kharif 2009 to 2012. Significant variety × nutrient interaction was observed with respect to seed yield, nodulation and other yield attributing characters. Based on the mean data over four years (2009-2012), highest seed yield of 5.84 q ha-1 was observed in Pusa 9531 with lime+50% organic+ 50% inorganic treatment followed by Dhauli (5.53 q ha-1) with the same nutrient treatment. Highest RWUE was found in Lime + 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatment in all the varieties followed by 100% organic treatment in Dhauli, Pusa-9531 and OBGG-52 but in 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatment in case of Nayagarh Local. The uptake of N, P and K was also observed to be the highest in Lime + 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatment in all the varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety and nutrient management interacted significantly for seed yield, nodulation and other yield attributes.

Treatment
nutriente0
Outcome
seed yield, nodulation and other yield attributing characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variety × nutrient interaction was observed with respect to seed yield, nodulation and other yield attributing characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa 9531 with lime and mixed organic and inorganic nutrient treatment had the highest seed yield, 5.84 q ha-1.

Material
Pusa 9531e0
Treatment
lime+50% organic+ 50% inorganic treatmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.84 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
5.53 q ha-1e0
Comparator
Dhaulie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest seed yield of 5.84 q ha-1 was observed in Pusa 9531 with lime+50% organic+ 50% inorganic treatment followed by Dhauli (5.53 q ha-1) with the same nutrient treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dhauli had seed yield of 5.53 q ha-1 under the same nutrient treatment, lower than Pusa 9531.

Material
Dhaulie0
Treatment
same nutrient treatmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
5.53 q ha-1e0
Comparator
Pusa 9531e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest seed yield of 5.84 q ha-1 was observed in Pusa 9531 with lime+50% organic+ 50% inorganic treatment followed by Dhauli (5.53 q ha-1) with the same nutrient treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime plus mixed organic and inorganic nutrients gave the highest rain water use efficiency in all varieties.

Treatment
Lime + 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatmente0
Outcome
RWUEe0
Direction
Higheste0
Comparator
all the varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest RWUE was found in Lime + 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatment in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Dhauli, Pusa-9531 and OBGG-52, 100% organic treatment ranked second in rain water use efficiency.

Material
Dhauli, Pusa-9531 and OBGG-52e0
Treatment
100% organic treatmente0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by 100% organic treatment in Dhauli, Pusa-9531 and OBGG-52”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Nayagarh Local, 50% organic and 50% inorganic treatment ranked second in rain water use efficiency.

Material
Nayagarh Locale0
Treatment
50% organic + 50% inorganic treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but in 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatment in case of Nayagarh Local”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lime and mixed nutrient treatment gave the highest uptake of N, P and K in all varieties.

Treatment
Lime + 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatmente0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of N, P and K was also observed to be the highest in Lime + 50% organic + 50% inorganic treatment in all the varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–54 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.