Paper · 2017 · Phytobiomes Journal

Root-Associated Bacterial and Fungal Community Profiles ofArabidopsis thalianaAre Robust Across Contrasting Soil P Levels

Chanz Robbins; Thorsten Thiergart; Stéphane Hacquard; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Plant survival depends on the ability of roots to sense and acquire nutrients in soils, which harbor a rich diversity of microbes. A subset of this microcosm interacts with plant roots and collectively forms root-associated microbial communities, termed the root microbiota. Under phosphorus-limiting conditions, some plants can engage in mutualistic interactions, for example with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Here, we describe how Arabidopsis thaliana, which lacks the genetic capacity for establishing the aforementioned symbiosis, interacts with soil-resident bacteria and fungi in soil from a long-term phosphorus fertilization trial. Long-term, contrasting fertilization regimes resulted in an ∼6-fold and ∼2.4-fold disparity in bioavailable and total phosphorous, respectively, which may explain differences in biomass of A. thaliana plants. Sequencing of marker genes enabled us to characterize bacterial and fungal communities present in the bulk soil, rhizosphere, and root compartments. Phosphorus had little effect on alpha- or beta-diversity indices, but more strongly influences bacterial and fungal community shifts in plant-associated compartments compared with bulk soil. The significant impact of soil P abundance could only be resolved at operational taxonomic unit level, and these subtle differences are more pronounced in the root compartment. We conclude that despite decades of different fertilization, both bacterial and fungal soil communities remained unexpectedly stable in soils tested, suggesting that the soil biota is resilient over time to nutrient supplementation. Conversely, low-abundance, root-associated microbes, which collectively represent 2 to 3% of the relative abundance of bacteria and fungi in the roots, exhibited a subtle, yet significant shift between the two soils. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contrasting fertilization produced approximately six-fold disparity in bioavailable phosphorus.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Outcome
bioavailablee0
Value
∼6-folde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term, contrasting fertilization regimes resulted in an ∼6-fold and ∼2.4-fold disparity in bioavailable and total phosphorous, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contrasting fertilization produced approximately 2.4-fold disparity in total phosphorus.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Outcome
total phosphorouse0
Value
∼2.4-folde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term, contrasting fertilization regimes resulted in an ∼6-fold and ∼2.4-fold disparity in bioavailable and total phosphorous, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus disparity may explain differences in Arabidopsis biomass.

Taxon
A. thalianaArabidopsis thalianae0
Treatment
fertilization regimese1
Outcome
biomass of A. thaliana plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which may explain differences in biomass of A. thaliana plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“Long-term, contrasting fertilization regimes resulted in an ∼6-fold and ∼2.4-fold disparity in bioavailable and total phosphorous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus had little effect on alpha- and beta-diversity indices.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Treatment
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
alpha- or beta-diversity indicese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus had little effect on alpha- or beta-diversity indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus influenced bacterial and fungal community shifts more strongly in plant-associated compartments than bulk soil.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Organ / stage
plant-associated compartmentse0
Treatment
Phosphoruse0
Outcome
bacterial and fungal community shiftse0
Direction
more stronglye0
Comparator
bulk soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus had little effect on alpha- or beta-diversity indices, but more strongly influences bacterial and fungal community shifts in plant-associated compartments compared with bulk soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil phosphorus impacts were resolved only at operational taxonomic unit level and were more pronounced in roots.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Organ / stage
root compartmente0
Outcome
impact of soil P abundancee0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
operational taxonomic unit levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant impact of soil P abundance could only be resolved at operational taxonomic unit level, and these subtle differences are more pronounced in the root compartment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial and fungal soil communities remained stable after decades of different fertilization.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Outcome
bacterial and fungal soil communitiese0
Direction
remained unexpectedly stablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite decades of different fertilization, both bacterial and fungal soil communities remained unexpectedly stable in soils tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1515 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-abundance root-associated microbes, 2 to 3% of root bacteria and fungi, shifted significantly between soils.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
root-associated microbese0
Value
2 to 3%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low-abundance, root-associated microbes, which collectively represent 2 to 3% of the relative abundance of bacteria and fungi in the roots, exhibited a subtle, yet significant shift between the two soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1815 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arabidopsis thaliana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–454 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.