Paper · 2017 · Egyptian Journal of Horticulture

Application of Compost and Vermicompost as Substitutes for Mineral Fertilizers to Produce Green Beans

Saad Abou-El-Hassan; Mona Abd Elwanis; Mohamed El-Shinawy

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUSTAINABLE agricultural development need to provide alternatives of mineral fertilizers to produce safe food for humans, maintain of soil fertility and preserve of environment from pollution. Field experiment was conducted at the site of Vegetable Research Departments, Horticulture Research Institutein Giza Governorate, Egypt, to study possibility of using compost and vermicompost (compost of earthworm) as substitutes partial or fully for mineral fertilizers used in the production of green beans. The beanseeds (cv. Paulista) were sown in clay soil duringthe summer season of 2016 and 2017. Treatments of compost and vermicompost individually orin combination with or without adding 50% of recommended dose of mineral fertilizers,were investigated on bean plants. The effects of these treatments on the growth and yield of green beans were compared tofull recommendeddose of mineral fertilizers as control. All treatments of compost and vermicompostwithout mineral fertilizers decreased all the vegetative properties of bean plants. Compost and vermicompost singly or in combination + 50% mineral fertilizers were not showed any significant differences compared to 100% mineral fertilizers. The treatments of 100% mineral fertilizers and 50% mineral fertilizers + vermicompost sole or combined with compost gave the highest early and total yield compared to other treatments.Applyingcompost and vermicompostwith or without mineral fertilizers, decreased nitrate content of bean pods. This study suggested possibilityfor using compost and vermicompost to reduce the amount of mineral fertilizers to produce good yield,healthyand safe of green beans.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and vermicompost without mineral fertilizers decreased all vegetative properties of bean plants compared with the full mineral fertilizer control.

Taxon
bean plantse3
Material
Paulistae1
Treatment
compost and vermicomposte3
Outcome
vegetative propertiese3
Direction
decreasede3
Qualifier
without mineral fertilizerse3
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Giza Governorate, Egypte0

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment was conducted at the site of Vegetable Research Departments, Horticulture Research Institutein Giza Governorate, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–328 · show in text ↑
e1

“The beanseeds (cv. Paulista) were sown in clay soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–554 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effects of these treatments on the growth and yield of green beans were compared tofull recommendeddose of mineral fertilizers as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–911 · show in text ↑
e3

“All treatments of compost and vermicompostwithout mineral fertilizers decreased all the vegetative properties of bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1037 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and vermicompost singly or combined with 50% mineral fertilizer did not differ significantly from 100% mineral fertilizer in growth and yield.

Taxon
green beanse2
Treatment
compost and vermicompost singly or in combination + 50% mineral fertilizerse3
Outcome
growth and yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
100% mineral fertilizerse3

Verbatim

e2

“The effects of these treatments on the growth and yield of green beans were compared tofull recommendeddose of mineral fertilizers as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–911 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compost and vermicompost singly or in combination + 50% mineral fertilizers were not showed any significant differences compared to 100% mineral fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% mineral fertilizers gave the highest early and total yield compared with other treatments.

Taxon
green beanse2
Treatment
100% mineral fertilizerse3
Outcome
early and total yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Verbatim

e2

“The effects of these treatments on the growth and yield of green beans were compared tofull recommendeddose of mineral fertilizers as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–911 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatments of 100% mineral fertilizers and 50% mineral fertilizers + vermicompost sole or combined with compost gave the highest early and total yield compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% mineral fertilizers plus vermicompost, alone or with compost, gave the highest early and total yield compared with other treatments.

Taxon
green beanse2
Treatment
50% mineral fertilizers + vermicomposte3
Outcome
early and total yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Verbatim

e2

“The effects of these treatments on the growth and yield of green beans were compared tofull recommendeddose of mineral fertilizers as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–911 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatments of 100% mineral fertilizers and 50% mineral fertilizers + vermicompost sole or combined with compost gave the highest early and total yield compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost and vermicompost with or without mineral fertilizers decreased nitrate content of bean pods.

Taxon
green beanse2
Organ / stage
bean podse3
Treatment
compost and vermicomposte3
Outcome
nitrate contente3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“The effects of these treatments on the growth and yield of green beans were compared tofull recommendeddose of mineral fertilizers as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–911 · show in text ↑
e3

“Applyingcompost and vermicompostwith or without mineral fertilizers, decreased nitrate content of bean pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1488 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest compost and vermicompost can reduce the amount of mineral fertilizer while still giving good, safe green bean yield.

Taxon
green beanse2
Treatment
compost and vermicomposte3
Outcome
reduce the amount of mineral fertilizerse3

Verbatim

e2

“The effects of these treatments on the growth and yield of green beans were compared tofull recommendeddose of mineral fertilizers as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–911 · show in text ↑
e3

“for using compost and vermicompost to reduce the amount of mineral fertilizers to produce good yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1622 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 52 positive, 13 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.