Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Soil and Foliar Application of Multi Micronutrients on Fruit Yield and Physical Parameters of Fruit of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali

Sumit Singh; N.S. Parekh; Hiral R. Patel; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out at Horticultural Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, B. A. College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand during the year 2014-15to study the effect of soil and foliar application of multi micronutrients on fruit yield and physical parameters of fruits of mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with factorial concept with three levels of soil application viz., S1 (control), S2 (200 g/tree multi micronutrient Grade-V) and S3 (400 g/tree multi micronutrient Grade-V) and three level of foliar application viz., F1 (control), F2 (1% Spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV) and F3 (2% Spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV) and replicated thrice. Multi micronutrients were sprayed at three stages i.e.at flower bud initiation, at full bloom stage and at pea stage. In present investigation significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g), fruit volume (162.86 cc), numbers of fruits per tree (353.00), fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg), fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) and fruit retention per panicle (4.00) were recorded under the treatment F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 foliar micronutrient treatment gave the significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g) in Amrapali mango.

Taxon
Mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Material
Amrapalit0
Treatment
F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
186.38 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g), fruit volume (162.86 cc), numbers of fruits per tree (353.00), fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg), fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) and fruit retention per panicle (4.00) were recorded under the treatment F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Soil and Foliar Application of Multi Micronutrients on Fruit Yield and Physical Parameters of Fruit of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 foliar micronutrient treatment gave the significantly maximum fruit volume (162.86 cc) in Amrapali mango.

Taxon
Mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Material
Amrapalit0
Treatment
F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)e0
Outcome
fruit volumee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
162.86 cce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g), fruit volume (162.86 cc), numbers of fruits per tree (353.00), fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg), fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) and fruit retention per panicle (4.00) were recorded under the treatment F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Soil and Foliar Application of Multi Micronutrients on Fruit Yield and Physical Parameters of Fruit of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 foliar micronutrient treatment gave the significantly maximum numbers of fruits per tree (353.00) in Amrapali mango.

Taxon
Mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Material
Amrapalit0
Treatment
F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)e0
Outcome
numbers of fruits per treee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
353.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g), fruit volume (162.86 cc), numbers of fruits per tree (353.00), fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg), fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) and fruit retention per panicle (4.00) were recorded under the treatment F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Soil and Foliar Application of Multi Micronutrients on Fruit Yield and Physical Parameters of Fruit of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 foliar micronutrient treatment gave the significantly maximum fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg) in Amrapali mango.

Taxon
Mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Material
Amrapalit0
Treatment
F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)e0
Outcome
fruit yield of fruits per treee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
62.99 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g), fruit volume (162.86 cc), numbers of fruits per tree (353.00), fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg), fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) and fruit retention per panicle (4.00) were recorded under the treatment F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Soil and Foliar Application of Multi Micronutrients on Fruit Yield and Physical Parameters of Fruit of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 foliar micronutrient treatment gave the significantly maximum fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) in Amrapali mango.

Taxon
Mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Material
Amrapalit0
Treatment
F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)e0
Outcome
fruit yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.84 tonnee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g), fruit volume (162.86 cc), numbers of fruits per tree (353.00), fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg), fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) and fruit retention per panicle (4.00) were recorded under the treatment F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Soil and Foliar Application of Multi Micronutrients on Fruit Yield and Physical Parameters of Fruit of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The F2 foliar micronutrient treatment gave the significantly maximum fruit retention per panicle (4.00) in Amrapali mango.

Taxon
Mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Material
Amrapalit0
Treatment
F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)e0
Outcome
fruit retention per paniclee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly maximum fruit weight (186.38 g), fruit volume (162.86 cc), numbers of fruits per tree (353.00), fruit yield of fruits per tree (62.99 kg), fruit yield per hectare (9.84 tonne) and fruit retention per panicle (4.00) were recorded under the treatment F2 (1% spray of multi micronutrient Grade-IV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Soil and Foliar Application of Multi Micronutrients on Fruit Yield and Physical Parameters of Fruit of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Amrapali”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–154 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 80 positive, 5 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.