Paper · 2017 · Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology

Genetic variation of salt-stressed durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum Desf.) genotypes under field conditions and gynogenetic capacity

Olfa Ayed-Slama; Imen Bouhaouel; Zoubeir Chamekh; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

) differ by their degree of salinity of the water irrigation. The results showed that most of the agronomic traits (e.g. spike per meter square, thousand kernels weight and grain yield) were reduced by salinity. Durum wheat landraces, Mahmoudi and Hmira, and improved varieties, Maali and Om Rabia showed the widest adaptability to different quality of irrigation water. Genotypes including Jneh Kotifa and Arbi were estimated as stable genotypes under adverse conditions. Thereafter, salt-tolerant (Hmira and Jneh Khotifa) and the most cultivated high-yielding (Karim, Razzak and Khiar) genotypes were tested for their gynogenetic ability to obtain haploids and doubled haploid lines. Genotypes with good induction capacity had not necessarily a good capacity of regeneration of haploid plantlets. In our conditions, Hmira and Khiar exhibited the best gynogenetic ability (3.1% and 2.9% of haploid plantlets, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced most agronomic traits, including spikes per square meter, thousand-kernel weight and grain yield.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
spike per meter square, thousand kernels weight and grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum Desf.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“most of the agronomic traits (e.g. spike per meter square, thousand kernels weight and grain yield) were reduced by salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mahmoudi and Hmira landraces showed the widest adaptability to irrigation water quality.

Material
Mahmoudi and Hmirae0
Outcome
widest adaptability to different quality of irrigation watere0
Direction
wideste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Durum wheat landraces, Mahmoudi and Hmira, and improved varieties, Maali and Om Rabia showed the widest adaptability to different quality of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–370 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maali and Om Rabia improved varieties showed the widest adaptability to irrigation water quality.

Material
Maali and Om Rabiae0
Outcome
widest adaptability to different quality of irrigation watere0
Direction
wideste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Durum wheat landraces, Mahmoudi and Hmira, and improved varieties, Maali and Om Rabia showed the widest adaptability to different quality of irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–370 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jneh Kotifa and Arbi were estimated stable under adverse conditions.

Material
Jneh Kotifa and Arbie0
Outcome
stable genotypes under adverse conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Genotypes including Jneh Kotifa and Arbi were estimated as stable genotypes under adverse conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–472 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Good gynogenetic induction capacity did not necessarily coincide with good haploid plantlet regeneration.

Material
Genotypes with good induction capacitye0
Outcome
capacity of regeneration of haploid plantletse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Genotypes with good induction capacity had not necessarily a good capacity of regeneration of haploid plantlets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–798 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hmira showed the best gynogenetic ability, with 3.1% haploid plantlets.

Material
Hmirae0
Outcome
best gynogenetic abilitye0
Direction
beste0
Value
3.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hmira and Khiar exhibited the best gynogenetic ability (3.1% and 2.9% of haploid plantlets, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Khiar showed the best gynogenetic ability, with 2.9% haploid plantlets.

Material
Khiare0
Outcome
best gynogenetic abilitye0
Direction
beste0
Value
2.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hmira and Khiar exhibited the best gynogenetic ability (3.1% and 2.9% of haploid plantlets, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–923 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

12 papers: 0 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.