Paper · 2017 · Plants

Comparative Analysis of the Nitrogen Effect of Common Agricultural Practices and Rotation Systems in a Rainfed Mediterranean Environment

Panagiotis Dalias; Damianos Neocleous

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The nitrogen (N) effect of legumes is one of the main reasons for their inclusion in rotation systems and their success in rainfed agriculture of Mediterranean areas. The comparative analysis of this effect in relation to alternative systems or practices is essential for a comprehensive appreciation in their merit. This field experiment was comprised of four three-year rotation cycles. Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded for two consecutive years after common vetch (Vicia sativa L.), treated in three different ways, and after fallow and compared with three wheat monocultures: the conventional one, the continuous straw incorporation, and the sewage sludge incorporation once every three years. Wheat grain and straw yields and N uptake were compared among treatments. Results showed that rotation systems that included vetch were the most promising for improving sustainability. Maximum N uptake and the greatest yield surpluses were obtained when wheat followed vetch incorporated during flowering. When vetch in the rotation was cut for hay or left to fill grains subsequent wheat showed also enhanced yields. Fallow affected the rotation system’s fertility due to the incorporation of volunteer plants into the soil. Sewage sludge sustained production without the need for inorganic fertilization during three years. Straw incorporation always gave the smallest yields and N harvests, presumably due to soil N immobilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following vetch incorporated during flowering had maximum N uptake.

Treatment
vetch incorporated during floweringe0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum N uptake and the greatest yield surpluses were obtained when wheat followed vetch incorporated during flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following vetch incorporated during flowering had the greatest yield surpluses.

Treatment
vetch incorporated during floweringe0
Outcome
yield surplusese0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum N uptake and the greatest yield surpluses were obtained when wheat followed vetch incorporated during flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting rotation vetch for hay enhanced subsequent wheat yields.

Treatment
vetch in the rotation was cut for haye0
Outcome
subsequent wheat showed also enhanced yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When vetch in the rotation was cut for hay or left to fill grains subsequent wheat showed also enhanced yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allowing rotation vetch to fill grains enhanced subsequent wheat yields.

Treatment
left to fill grainse0
Outcome
subsequent wheat showed also enhanced yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When vetch in the rotation was cut for hay or left to fill grains subsequent wheat showed also enhanced yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rotation systems including vetch were judged most promising for sustainability.

Treatment
rotation systems that included vetche0
Outcome
most promising for improving sustainabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that rotation systems that included vetch were the most promising for improving sustainability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–892 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow affected rotation fertility through incorporated volunteer plants.

Treatment
Fallowe0
Outcome
rotation system’s fertilitye0
Qualifier
incorporation of volunteer plants into the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fallow affected the rotation system’s fertility due to the incorporation of volunteer plants into the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge sustained production without inorganic fertilizer for three years.

Treatment
Sewage sludgee0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
sustainede0
Qualifier
without the need for inorganic fertilization during three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sewage sludge sustained production without the need for inorganic fertilization during three years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation produced the smallest yields.

Treatment
Straw incorporatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
smalleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw incorporation always gave the smallest yields and N harvests, presumably due to soil N immobilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation produced the smallest N harvests.

Treatment
Straw incorporatione0
Outcome
N harvestse0
Direction
smalleste0
Qualifier
presumably due to soil N immobilizatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw incorporation always gave the smallest yields and N harvests, presumably due to soil N immobilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat (Triticum turgidum durum) was seeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–431 · show in text ↑

stage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.