Paper · 1998 · Acta agriculturae Slovenica

CO2 exchange rate of apple fruitlets before the abscission

Matej STOPAR; Ana GREGORČIČ; Franc BATIČ

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fruit CO2 exchange at the time of fruit setting period was evaluated on mature cv. 'Jonagold' apple trees after 4 days artificial shading with 90 % photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) reduction and after NAA 15 ppm and BA 50 ppm applied immediately after the end of shading. Light reduction which accelerated fruitlets abscission very quickly had a depressive effect on fruits CO2 dark respiration rate (Rd) and gross assimilation rate (Ag) 3 days after the end of shading. Similarly, reduced Rd and less negative net CO2 assimilation rate (A) was recorded on fruitlets 7 days after NAA and BA application what is explained as a diminished metabolism of fruits starting with abscission. The fruitlets from shaded trees, which did not tend to abscission any more, showed an enhanced Rd and more negative A on 7th or 8th day after the end of shading. Ethylene evolution from fruits 2nd and 7th day after NAA 15 ppm application was enhanced comparing to control fruits. BA 50 ppm enhanced ethylene evolution on 2nd day after spraying, however on 7th day the ethylene evolution was lower than in control fruits. Healthy, not to drop inclined fruitlets retained on trees 7 days after shading treatment, showed stronger fruit ethylene production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading accelerated fruitlet abscission.

Treatment
Light reductione0
Outcome
fruitlets abscissione0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light reduction which accelerated fruitlets abscission very quickly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–339 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light reduction depressed fruit dark respiration three days after shading.

Treatment
Light reductione0
Outcome
fruits CO2 dark respiration rate (Rd)e0
Direction
depressivee0
Qualifier
3 days after the end of shadinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light reduction which accelerated fruitlets abscission very quickly had a depressive effect on fruits CO2 dark respiration rate (Rd) and gross assimilation rate (Ag) 3 days after the end of shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light reduction depressed gross assimilation three days after shading.

Treatment
Light reductione0
Outcome
gross assimilation rate (Ag)e0
Direction
depressivee0
Qualifier
3 days after the end of shadinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light reduction which accelerated fruitlets abscission very quickly had a depressive effect on fruits CO2 dark respiration rate (Rd) and gross assimilation rate (Ag) 3 days after the end of shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA application reduced fruitlet dark respiration seven days later.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
Rde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
7 days after NAA and BA applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced Rd and less negative net CO2 assimilation rate (A) was recorded on fruitlets 7 days after NAA and BA application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA application reduced fruitlet dark respiration seven days later.

Treatment
BAe0
Outcome
Rde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
7 days after NAA and BA applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced Rd and less negative net CO2 assimilation rate (A) was recorded on fruitlets 7 days after NAA and BA application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA produced less negative fruitlet net CO2 assimilation seven days later.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
net CO2 assimilation rate (A)e0
Direction
less negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less negative net CO2 assimilation rate (A) was recorded on fruitlets 7 days after NAA and BA application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA produced less negative fruitlet net CO2 assimilation seven days later.

Treatment
BAe0
Outcome
net CO2 assimilation rate (A)e0
Direction
less negativee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less negative net CO2 assimilation rate (A) was recorded on fruitlets 7 days after NAA and BA application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruitlets retained after shading showed enhanced dark respiration on days seven or eight.

Outcome
Rde0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
7th or 8th day after the end of shadinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruitlets from shaded trees, which did not tend to abscission any more, showed an enhanced Rd and more negative A on 7th or 8th day after the end of shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruitlets retained after shading showed more negative net assimilation on days seven or eight.

Outcome
Ae0
Direction
more negativee0
Qualifier
7th or 8th day after the end of shadinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruitlets from shaded trees, which did not tend to abscission any more, showed an enhanced Rd and more negative A on 7th or 8th day after the end of shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA enhanced fruit ethylene evolution on days two and seven versus controls.

Treatment
NAA 15 ppme0
Outcome
Ethylene evolution from fruitse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
2nd and 7th daye0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene evolution from fruits 2nd and 7th day after NAA 15 ppm application was enhanced comparing to control fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA enhanced fruit ethylene evolution on day two.

Treatment
BA 50 ppme0
Outcome
ethylene evolutione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
2nd daye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BA 50 ppm enhanced ethylene evolution on 2nd day after spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA reduced fruit ethylene evolution on day seven versus controls.

Outcome
ethylene evolutione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
7th daye0
Comparator
control fruitse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on 7th day the ethylene evolution was lower than in control fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Healthy retained fruitlets showed stronger ethylene production seven days after shading.

Outcome
fruit ethylene productione0
Direction
strongere0
Qualifier
7 days after shading treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Healthy, not to drop inclined fruitlets retained on trees 7 days after shading treatment, showed stronger fruit ethylene production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruitlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.