Abstract
Fertilizers are one of the costly inputs but continue to exert significant contribution to produce additional food grains. To realize maximum benefits and reduce nutrient losses from fertilizers, they must be applied in the right quantity, source and combination at the right time using the right method. An investigation on requirement of P for finger millet and maize in EDZ of Karnataka was taken at UAS, Bangalore. Response of finger millet and maize to graded levels of P was studied in the field by creating five phosphorus fertility gradients viz., P0 (Very low), P1 (Low), P2 (Medium), P3 (High) and P4 (Very high) (< 15: 16-30: 31-45: 46-60: > 60 kg P2O5 ha-1, respectively). Results revealed that, application of 125% RDP with rec. NK&FYM recorded higher finger millet (31.66 and 55.32 q ha-1 grain and straw, respectively) and maize (78.26 q ha-1 grain) yield in high P strip. Grain yield and harvest index of cropping system as a whole improved significantly in FYM supplied plots. Phosphorus use efficiency in maize was higher than finger millet. The higher use efficiency was recorded in very low gradient strip. Higher PUE among treatments was obtained when P was applied at the rate of 75 % of recommended dose along with rec. N&K. Application of 75 % rec. P + rec. N&K recorded higher B: C ratio in both the crops and was the best and optimum P prescription for these crops as the P use efficiency was also higher.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
125% RDP with recommended NK and FYM gave higher finger millet grain and straw yield (31.66 and 55.32 q/ha) in the high P strip.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae0 - Treatment
- application of 125% RDP with rec. NK&FYMe1
- Outcome
- grain and strawe1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 31.66 and 55.32 q ha-1e1
- Setting
- high P stripe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An investigation on requirement of P for finger millet and maize in EDZ of Karnataka was taken at UAS, Bangalore”
e1“application of 125% RDP with rec. NK&FYM recorded higher finger millet (31.66 and 55.32 q ha-1 grain and straw, respectively) and maize (78.26 q ha-1 grain) yield in high P strip”
Claim · model-written summary
125% RDP with recommended NK and FYM gave higher maize grain yield (78.26 q/ha) in the high P strip.
- Treatment
- application of 125% RDP with rec. NK&FYMe1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 78.26 q ha-1e1
- Qualifier
- graine1
- Setting
- high P stripe1
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An investigation on requirement of P for finger millet and maize in EDZ of Karnataka was taken at UAS, Bangalore”
e1“application of 125% RDP with rec. NK&FYM recorded higher finger millet (31.66 and 55.32 q ha-1 grain and straw, respectively) and maize (78.26 q ha-1 grain) yield in high P strip”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield and harvest index of the cropping system as a whole improved significantly where FYM was supplied.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- FYM supplied plotse2
- Outcome
- Grain yield and harvest indexe2
- Direction
- improvede2
- Qualifier
- cropping system as a wholee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An investigation on requirement of P for finger millet and maize in EDZ of Karnataka was taken at UAS, Bangalore”
e2“Grain yield and harvest index of cropping system as a whole improved significantly in FYM supplied plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus use efficiency was higher in maize than in finger millet.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Phosphorus use efficiency in maize was higher than finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
The higher use efficiency of the crops was recorded in the very low P gradient strip.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Outcome
- use efficiencye4
- Direction
- highere4
- Setting
- very low gradient stripe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet - Maize Cropping System”
e4“The higher use efficiency was recorded in very low gradient strip”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher P use efficiency among treatments was obtained when P was applied at 75% of the recommended dose with recommended N and K.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- P was applied at the rate of 75 % of recommended dose along with rec. N&Ke5
- Outcome
- PUEe5
- Direction
- Highere5
- Qualifier
- among treatmentse5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet - Maize Cropping System”
e5“Higher PUE among treatments was obtained when P was applied at the rate of 75 % of recommended dose along with rec. N&K”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 75% recommended P with recommended N and K gave a higher benefit-cost ratio in both crops.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Application of 75 % rec. P + rec. N&Ke6
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe6
- Direction
- highere6
- Qualifier
- in both the cropse6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet - Maize Cropping System”
e6“Application of 75 % rec. P + rec. N&K recorded higher B: C ratio in both the crops and was the best and optimum P prescription for these crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 75% recommended P with recommended N and K was the best and optimum P prescription for these crops.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Application of 75 % rec. P + rec. N&Ke6
- Outcome
- best and optimum P prescriptione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Finger Millet - Maize Cropping System”
e6“Application of 75 % rec. P + rec. N&K recorded higher B: C ratio in both the crops and was the best and optimum P prescription for these crops”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.