Paper · 2017 · Crop and Pasture Science

Quantifying the interactions between defoliation interval, defoliation intensity and nitrogen fertiliser application on the nutritive value of rainfed and irrigated perennial ryegrass

K. G. Pembleton; R. P. Rawnsley; L. R. Turner; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A key goal of temperate pasture management is to optimise nutritive value and production. The influence of individual components such as irrigation, nitrogen (N) fertiliser, and grazing interval and intensity has been well researched, yet conjecture remains regarding practices that optimise pasture nutritive value, largely because interactions between inputs and grazing management have not been quantified. A 2-year, split-split-plot experiment was undertaken to investigate these interactions in a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) dominant pasture at Elliott, Tasmania. Irrigation treatments (rainfed or irrigated) were main plots and defoliation intervals (leaf regrowth stage: 1-, 2- or 3-leaf) were subplots. Defoliation intensity (defoliation height: 30, 55 or 80 mm) and N fertiliser (0, 1.5 or 3.0 kg N/ha.day) were crossed within sub-subplots. Herbage samples were collected from each plot four times during the experiment and analysed for concentrations (% dry matter, DM) of neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and crude protein (CP). Metabolisable energy (ME) concentration (MJ/kg DM) was estimated from these values. ME concentration decreased as defoliation height and interval increased for all time points except during winter. Crude protein concentration increased with increasing N fertiliser applications in the plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stage, but only as N applications increased from 1.5 to 3.0 kg N/ha.day for the plots defoliated at the 2- and 3-leaf stages. As N application rates increased from 0 to 1.5 kg N/ha.day, plots defoliated at the 3-leaf stage had greater increases in NDF concentration than plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stage, except during spring. As defoliation height and interval increased, ADF concentration increased in both spring and summer. Although defoliating at frequent intervals (1-leaf stage) and lower heights (30 mm) produced pasture of marginally higher nutritional value, these benefits are mitigated by the previously established, negative consequences of lower pasture yield and poor pasture persistence. Consequently, grazing management that maximises pasture productivity and persistence (i.e. defoliation between the 2- and 3-leaf regrowth stages to a height of 55 mm) should be applied to perennial ryegrass pastures irrespective of input management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolisable energy concentration of perennial ryegrass decreased as defoliation height and interval increased, except in winter.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
defoliation height and intervale1
Outcome
ME concentratione1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
except during wintere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–183 · show in text ↑
e1

“ME concentration decreased as defoliation height and interval increased for all time points except during winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein concentration increased with N fertiliser in plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
N fertilisere2
Outcome
Crude protein concentratione2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in the plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“Crude protein concentration increased with increasing N fertiliser applications in the plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein concentration increased only as N applications rose from 1.5 to 3.0 kg N/ha.day in plots defoliated at the 2- and 3-leaf stages.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
N applicationse3
Outcome
Crude protein concentratione2
Direction
increasede3
Value
1.5 to 3.0 kg N/ha.daye3
Qualifier
for the plots defoliated at the 2- and 3-leaf stagese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–183 · show in text ↑
e2

“Crude protein concentration increased with increasing N fertiliser applications in the plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1397 · show in text ↑
e3

“but only as N applications increased from 1.5 to 3.0 kg N/ha.day for the plots defoliated at the 2- and 3-leaf stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

As N application rose from 0 to 1.5 kg N/ha.day, plots defoliated at the 3-leaf stage had greater increases in NDF concentration than plots at the 1-leaf stage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
N application ratese4
Outcome
NDF concentratione4
Direction
greater increasese4
Value
0 to 1.5 kg N/ha.daye4
Qualifier
except during springe4
Comparator
plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stagee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–183 · show in text ↑
e4

“As N application rates increased from 0 to 1.5 kg N/ha.day, plots defoliated at the 3-leaf stage had greater increases in NDF concentration than plots defoliated at the 1-leaf stage, except during spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ADF concentration of perennial ryegrass increased as defoliation height and interval increased, in spring and summer.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
defoliation height and intervale5
Outcome
ADF concentratione5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
in both spring and summere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–183 · show in text ↑
e5

“As defoliation height and interval increased, ADF concentration increased in both spring and summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frequent defoliation intervals and lower heights produced pasture of marginally higher nutritional value.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennet0
Treatment
frequent intervals (1-leaf stage) and lower heights (30 mm)e6
Outcome
nutritional valuee6
Direction
highere6
Qualifier
marginallye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 165–183 · show in text ↑
e6

“Although defoliating at frequent intervals (1-leaf stage) and lower heights (30 mm) produced pasture of marginally higher nutritional value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1963 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation between the 2- and 3-leaf stages to 55 mm should be applied to perennial ryegrass pastures to maximise productivity and persistence.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee7
Treatment
defoliation between the 2- and 3-leaf regrowth stages to a height of 55 mme7
Outcome
grazing management that maximises pasture productivity and persistencee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“grazing management that maximises pasture productivity and persistence (i.e. defoliation between the 2- and 3-leaf regrowth stages to a height of 55 mm) should be applied to perennial ryegrass pastures irrespective of input management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2114–2348 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: grain · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

pruning · molecular: metabolites · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.