Paper · 2017 · Ciência Rural

Growth and production of common bean fertilized with biochar

Isley Cristiellem Bicalho da Silva; Luiz Arnaldo Fernandes; Fernando Colen; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Production of biochar from organic wastes promises to be an interesting source of plant nutrients, thus reducing pressure on natural resources. To assess the effect of biochar prepared from wastes filtration materials on the growth and production of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), three simultaneous greenhouse experiments were conducted with three different biochar from organic wastes (rice husk, sawdust, and sorghum silage) using as filtration material for swine biofertilizer. In each experiment the treatments consisted of the addition of five different biochar concentrations (0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% v/v), arranged in a completely random design, with four repetitions. Application of biochar increased the root dry mass, shoot dry mass, grain dry mass, number of pods and number of grains. These results indicated that biochar contributed significantly to the growth and production of common bean plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application increased root, shoot and grain dry mass of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
biochare1
Outcome
root dry mass, shoot dry mass, grain dry masse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
greenhouse experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“three simultaneous greenhouse experiments were conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of biochar increased the root dry mass, shoot dry mass, grain dry mass, number of pods and number of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application increased the number of pods and grains of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
biochare1
Outcome
number of pods and number of grainse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
greenhouse experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“three simultaneous greenhouse experiments were conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of biochar increased the root dry mass, shoot dry mass, grain dry mass, number of pods and number of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–816 · show in text ↑

biochar · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

biochar · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.