Paper · 2009 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

EFFECT OF SOWING DATES AND PLANT SPACING ON GROWTH AND DRY MATTER PARTITIONING IN COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.)

A. HAKOOMAT; Mohammad Naveed Afzal; M Dilbaugh

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Among agronomic factors, sowing time and plant spacing are considered key management components in any cropping system to harvest a profitable seed cotton yield. Thus, the present studies were conducted to determine the effects of sowing date and plant spacing on growth and yield of cotton under an arid sub-tropical continental climate during 2004-05. Result indicated better yield responses and reproductive vegetative ratio (RVR) in early sown cotton at high plant density. For crop growth rate (CGR) and relative growth rate (RGR), different plant responses were observed. Early sowing showed the highest CGR50 and RGR50 while at late sowings, CGR100 or CGR150 was highest. Correlation analysis and Path analysis were carried out to understand the effect of different plant traits on seed cotton yield under optimum plant spacing (15cm) and sowing dates (10-May). Both conditions indicated highest association of seed cotton yield with number of bolls per plant and reproductive/vegetative ratio. On the other hand boll weight showed negative association with seed cotton yield. However, path analysis showed the highest direct effect of reproductive/vegetative ratio on seed cotton yield under early sowing dates (10-May). Furthermore, highest correlation of boll number with seed cotton yield was also due to indirect effects through RVR. On the other hand, reproductive dry matter showed highest direct effect on seed cotton yield under high plant density (15cm).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing at high density improved cotton yield response.

Treatment
early sown cotton at high plant densitye0
Outcome
yield responsese0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result indicated better yield responses and reproductive vegetative ratio (RVR) in early sown cotton at high plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing at high density improved reproductive vegetative ratio.

Treatment
early sown cotton at high plant densitye0
Outcome
reproductive vegetative ratio (RVR)e0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Result indicated better yield responses and reproductive vegetative ratio (RVR) in early sown cotton at high plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing had the highest CGR50.

Treatment
Early sowinge0
Outcome
CGR50e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
late sowingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early sowing showed the highest CGR50 and RGR50 while at late sowings, CGR100 or CGR150 was highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing had the highest RGR50.

Treatment
Early sowinge0
Outcome
RGR50e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
late sowingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early sowing showed the highest CGR50 and RGR50 while at late sowings, CGR100 or CGR150 was highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late sowings had the highest CGR100 or CGR150.

Treatment
late sowingse0
Outcome
CGR100 or CGR150e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Early sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early sowing showed the highest CGR50 and RGR50 while at late sowings, CGR100 or CGR150 was highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–678 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was most associated with boll number.

Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highest associatione0
Qualifier
number of bolls per plante0
Setting
optimum plant spacing (15cm) and sowing dates (10-May)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both conditions indicated highest association of seed cotton yield with number of bolls per plant and reproductive/vegetative ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“under optimum plant spacing (15cm) and sowing dates (10-May)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–867 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was most associated with reproductive/vegetative ratio.

Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highest associatione0
Qualifier
reproductive/vegetative ratioe0
Setting
optimum plant spacing (15cm) and sowing dates (10-May)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both conditions indicated highest association of seed cotton yield with number of bolls per plant and reproductive/vegetative ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“under optimum plant spacing (15cm) and sowing dates (10-May)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–867 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll weight was negatively associated with seed cotton yield.

Organ / stage
bolle0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
negative associatione0
Qualifier
boll weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“boll weight showed negative association with seed cotton yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Path analysis gave RVR the highest direct effect on yield under early sowing.

Treatment
early sowing dates (10-May)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highest direct effecte0
Qualifier
reproductive/vegetative ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“path analysis showed the highest direct effect of reproductive/vegetative ratio on seed cotton yield under early sowing dates (10-May).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The boll number correlation with yield included indirect effects through RVR.

Organ / stage
bolle0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highest correlatione0
Qualifier
indirect effects through RVRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest correlation of boll number with seed cotton yield was also due to indirect effects through RVR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive dry matter had the highest direct effect on yield at high density.

Treatment
high plant density (15cm)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highest direct effecte0
Qualifier
reproductive dry mattere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reproductive dry matter showed highest direct effect on seed cotton yield under high plant density (15cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 66 positive, 29 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

density · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 130 positive, 41 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.