Paper · 2015 · Journal of Horticultural Sciences

Effect of Radiation Interception and Canopy Temperature on Growth, Yield and Quality in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities

Lanuakum .; Graceli I Yepthomi; C S Maiti

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A study was made to test the effect of radiation interception and canopy temperature under different planting densities [T1- 1.5m x 1.5m (4,444 plants/ha); T2- 2m x 2m (2500 plants/ha); T3- 1.5m x 2.5m (2666 plants/ha); T4- 2m x 2.5m (2000 plants/ha); T5- 2.5m x 2.5m (1600 plants/ha)] on growth, yield and quality in banana cv. Grande Naine. With an increase in planting density, plant height increased significantly. Pseudostem was tallest in the closest spacing, viz., 1.5m x 1.5m (T1), and was shortest in the widest spacing, 2.5m x 2.5m (T5). T1 treatment (1.5m x 1.5m) recorded the least average-canopy-temperature (25.80°C/day) from the flowering to the harvest. T5 recorded the maximum average-radiation-interception, with a value of 432.16 lux/8 hr/day; whereas, T1 recorded minimum average-radiation-interception of 219.58 lux/8 hr/day. Significant influence of spacing was seen on yield /ha. Plants grown under higher density yielded comparatively higher yield (82.65 t/ha) under a spacing of 1.5m x 1.5m (T1). It is thus seen that growth parameters (pseudostem height and number of leaves) and yield/ha in banana was superior at a higher density (1.5m x 1.5m); whereas, in terms of quality of fruit (TSS and total sugar content) spacing of 2.5m x 2.5m was superior. This indicates a positive influence of radiation interception and canopy temperature in banana production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density significantly increased banana plant height.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
increase in planting densitye0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“With an increase in planting density, plant height increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–418 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana pseudostems were tallest at 1.5m x 1.5m and shortest at 2.5m x 2.5m spacing.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
1.5m x 1.5me0
Outcome
Pseudosteme0
Direction
talleste0
Comparator
2.5m x 2.5me0

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudostem was tallest in the closest spacing, viz., 1.5m x 1.5m (T1), and was shortest in the widest spacing, 2.5m x 2.5m (T5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana at 1.5m x 1.5m spacing had the lowest average canopy temperature from flowering to harvest, 25.80°C/day.

Taxon
Bananat0
Organ / stage
flowering to the harveste0
Treatment
1.5m x 1.5me0
Outcome
average-canopy-temperaturee0
Direction
leaste0
Value
25.80°C/daye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“T1 treatment (1.5m x 1.5m) recorded the least average-canopy-temperature (25.80°C/day) from the flowering to the harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana at T5 spacing had the highest average radiation interception, 432.16 lux/8 hr/day.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
average-radiation-interceptione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
432.16 lux/8 hr/daye0
Comparator
T1e0

Verbatim

e0

“T5 recorded the maximum average-radiation-interception, with a value of 432.16 lux/8 hr/day; whereas, T1 recorded minimum average-radiation-interception of 219.58 lux/8 hr/day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana at T1 spacing had the lowest average radiation interception, 219.58 lux/8 hr/day.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
average-radiation-interceptione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
219.58 lux/8 hr/daye0
Comparator
T5e0

Verbatim

e0

“T5 recorded the maximum average-radiation-interception, with a value of 432.16 lux/8 hr/day; whereas, T1 recorded minimum average-radiation-interception of 219.58 lux/8 hr/day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher-density banana planting at 1.5m x 1.5m produced a comparatively higher yield of 82.65 t/ha.

Taxon
Bananat0
Treatment
1.5m x 1.5me0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
82.65 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown under higher density yielded comparatively higher yield (82.65 t/ha) under a spacing of 1.5m x 1.5m (T1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana at 1.5m x 1.5m spacing had superior pseudostem height and number of leaves.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
1.5m x 1.5me0
Outcome
pseudostem height and number of leavese0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth parameters (pseudostem height and number of leaves) and yield/ha in banana was superior at a higher density (1.5m x 1.5m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banana fruit at 2.5m x 2.5m spacing had superior TSS and total sugar content.

Taxon
Bananat0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
2.5m x 2.5me0
Outcome
TSS and total sugar contente0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in terms of quality of fruit (TSS and total sugar content) spacing of 2.5m x 2.5m was superior.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Banana Cv. Grande Naine (AAA) under Different Planting Densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–152 · show in text ↑

density · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.