Abstract
This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of zinc, added into compound fertilizer in the production process, and zinc applied together with compound fertilizer on yield and quality component of sugar beet in 2009–2010.The treatments consisted of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) (12-30-12) compound fertilizer; 2. NPK (12-30-12) compound fertilizer + zinc sulfate and NPK (10-20-20) + 1% Zn compound fertilizer. Root yield, sugar percentage, white sugar percentage (WSP), white sugar yield (WSY), alpha-amino nitrogen, sodium and potassium concentration were investigated in this study. A total of 5 kg ha−1 zinc application on sugar beet significantly increased the yield and quality of sugar beet; the rate of increase was in the range of 4.62–6.97% in root yield, 2.09–5.75% in sugar percentage, 2.60–8.03% in WSP and 7.84–13.06% in WSY. NPK (10-20-20) + 1% Zn compound fertilizer and NPK (12-30-12) compound fertilizer + zinc applications increased the sugar beet yield and quality values in both years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application significantly increased root yield by 4.62–6.97%.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- 5 kg ha−1 zinc applicatione0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4.62–6.97%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A total of 5 kg ha−1 zinc application on sugar beet significantly increased the yield and quality of sugar beet; the rate of increase was in the range of 4.62–6.97% in root yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application significantly increased sugar percentage by 2.09–5.75%.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 5 kg ha−1 zinc applicatione0
- Outcome
- sugar percentagee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2.09–5.75%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A total of 5 kg ha−1 zinc application on sugar beet significantly increased the yield and quality of sugar beet; the rate of increase was in the range of 4.62–6.97% in root yield, 2.09–5.75% in sugar percentage”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application significantly increased white sugar percentage by 2.60–8.03%.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 5 kg ha−1 zinc applicatione0
- Outcome
- WSPe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 2.60–8.03%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A total of 5 kg ha−1 zinc application on sugar beet significantly increased the yield and quality of sugar beet; the rate of increase was in the range of 4.62–6.97% in root yield, 2.09–5.75% in sugar percentage, 2.60–8.03% in WSP”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application significantly increased white sugar yield by 7.84–13.06%.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- 5 kg ha−1 zinc applicatione0
- Outcome
- WSYe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 7.84–13.06%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A total of 5 kg ha−1 zinc application on sugar beet significantly increased the yield and quality of sugar beet; the rate of increase was in the range of 4.62–6.97% in root yield, 2.09–5.75% in sugar percentage, 2.60–8.03% in WSP and 7.84–13.06% in WSY.”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK (10-20-20) plus 1% Zn increased sugar beet yield and quality values in both years.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- NPK (10-20-20) + 1% Zn compound fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yield and quality valuese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- both yearse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NPK (10-20-20) + 1% Zn compound fertilizer and NPK (12-30-12) compound fertilizer + zinc applications increased the sugar beet yield and quality values in both years.”
Claim · model-written summary
NPK (12-30-12) plus zinc increased sugar beet yield and quality values in both years.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- NPK (12-30-12) compound fertilizer + zinc applicationse0
- Outcome
- yield and quality valuese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- both yearse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“NPK (10-20-20) + 1% Zn compound fertilizer and NPK (12-30-12) compound fertilizer + zinc applications increased the sugar beet yield and quality values in both years.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.