Abstract
ABSTRACT The no-tillage system can change the nitrogen dynamics in the soil, being necessary to adjust the nitrogen fertilization in order to provide this nutrient during critical phases of the common bean growth. This study aimed at evaluating the agronomic and qualitative traits of common bean grown under different straw types, as a function of the topdressing nitrogen fertilization splitting. A randomized block experimental design, in a split-plot arrangement, with four replications, was used. The plots consisted of three straw types (maize, maize intercropped with brachiaria and brachiaria), while the subplots comprised the combination of these straw materials with 8 topdressing nitrogen fertilization splitting arrangements. The common bean on brachiaria straw shows higher grain yields and crude protein contents. The nitrogen fertilization splitting, as topdressing, interacts with the straw types, increasing the number of pods per plant. The common bean plants growing on plots with single-maize straw had a shorter time for maximum hydration. The topdressing nitrogen fertilization splitting has no effect on the common bean qualitative traits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Common bean grown on brachiaria straw had higher grain yields and crude protein contents.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise1 - Treatment
- brachiaria strawe1
- Outcome
- grain yields and crude protein contentse1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The common bean on brachiaria straw shows higher grain yields and crude protein contents”
Claim · model-written summary
Topdressing nitrogen fertilization splitting increased the number of pods per plant, interacting with straw type.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise1 - Treatment
- nitrogen fertilization splittinge2
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante2
- Direction
- increasinge2
- Qualifier
- interacts with the straw typese2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The common bean on brachiaria straw shows higher grain yields and crude protein contents”
e2“The nitrogen fertilization splitting, as topdressing, interacts with the straw types, increasing the number of pods per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Common bean plants on plots with single-maize straw had a shorter time to maximum hydration.
- Taxon
- common bean plants
Phaseolus vulgarise3 - Treatment
- single-maize strawe3
- Outcome
- time for maximum hydratione3
- Direction
- shortere3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“The common bean plants growing on plots with single-maize straw had a shorter time for maximum hydration”
Claim · model-written summary
Topdressing nitrogen fertilization splitting had no effect on common bean qualitative traits.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise4 - Treatment
- topdressing nitrogen fertilization splittinge4
- Outcome
- qualitative traitse4
- Direction
- no effecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“The topdressing nitrogen fertilization splitting has no effect on the common bean qualitative traits”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
372 papers more in this group
See all 376 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.