Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Influence of compost/sludge application on sugarcane yield and nitrogen requirement on a sand soil

J. Mabry McCray; Shangning Ji; Modesto Ulloa

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Mineral soils in southern Florida are very low in organic matter content and most of the nitrogen (N) for sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) must be supplied in split fertilizer applications. Information is needed regarding how the interaction of organic amendments and fertilizer N influences sugarcane yields. A field study on a sand soil (Alfisol) was established to determine (1) potential sugarcane yield benefits of a compost/sludge amendment, and (2) the influence of the amendment on N fertilizer requirement. A split-plot Latin square design was used with five N rates (main plots) and presence or absence of compost/sludge broadcast at 113 m3 ha−1 (subplots). Annual N rates were 0, 67, 134, 202, and 269 kg N ha−1. Compost/sludge application increased cumulative t sucrose ha−1 by 36% averaged across N rates. The amendment also lowered annual N requirement by an average of 38%, but maintenance applications of compost/sludge will be required every four years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost/sludge increased cumulative sucrose yield by 36% across nitrogen rates.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Compost/sludge applicatione0
Outcome
cumulative t sucrose ha−1e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36%e0
Qualifier
averaged across N ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Compost/sludge application increased cumulative t sucrose ha−1 by 36% averaged across N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amendment lowered annual nitrogen requirement by an average of 38%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
amendmente0
Outcome
annual N requiremente0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The amendment also lowered annual N requirement by an average of 38%, but maintenance applications of compost/sludge will be required every four years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that compost/sludge needs maintenance applications every four years.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
maintenance applications of compost/sludge will be required every four years.e0

Verbatim

e0

“maintenance applications of compost/sludge will be required every four years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–52 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

organic · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.