Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore during rabi 2004 and summer 2005 to study the influence of intercropping of cowpea and nitrogen levels on nutrient uptake of multicut fodder sorghum. Harasona extracted higher amount of nutrients than other varieties of fodder sorghum. Intercropping of fodder cowpea in sorghum did not affect the nutrient uptake of ratoon crops significantly than application of 30 kg N/ha after each cutting but it was comparable with application of 45 kg N/ha after each cutting.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Harasona extracted more nutrients than other fodder sorghum varieties.
Verbatim
e0“Harasona extracted higher amount of nutrients than other varieties of fodder sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping did not significantly affect ratoon nutrient uptake compared with 30 kg N/ha after each cutting.
- Treatment
- Intercropping of fodder cowpeae0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake of ratoon cropse0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Comparator
- application of 30 kg N/ha after each cuttinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Intercropping of fodder cowpea in sorghum did not affect the nutrient uptake of ratoon crops significantly than application of 30 kg N/ha after each cutting”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping gave comparable nutrient uptake to 45 kg N/ha after each cutting.
- Treatment
- Intercropping of fodder cowpeae1
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake of ratoon cropse1
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- application of 45 kg N/ha after each cuttinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“it was comparable with application of 45 kg N/ha after each cutting”
e1“Intercropping of fodder cowpea in sorghum did not affect the nutrient uptake of ratoon crops significantly”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna unguiculata · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →intercropping · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.