Paper · 2011 · Crop Research

Nutrient uptake in multicut fodder sorghum under sole and intercropping situations with different nitrogen levels

K. Sankaranarayanan; N. Satheeshkumar; A. Solaimalai; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at Agricultural College and Research Institute, Coimbatore during rabi 2004 and summer 2005 to study the influence of intercropping of cowpea and nitrogen levels on nutrient uptake of multicut fodder sorghum. Harasona extracted higher amount of nutrients than other varieties of fodder sorghum. Intercropping of fodder cowpea in sorghum did not affect the nutrient uptake of ratoon crops significantly than application of 30 kg N/ha after each cutting but it was comparable with application of 45 kg N/ha after each cutting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harasona extracted more nutrients than other fodder sorghum varieties.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Material
Harasonae0
Outcome
amount of nutrientse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other varieties of fodder sorghume0

Verbatim

e0

“Harasona extracted higher amount of nutrients than other varieties of fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping did not significantly affect ratoon nutrient uptake compared with 30 kg N/ha after each cutting.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
Intercropping of fodder cowpeae0
Outcome
nutrient uptake of ratoon cropse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
application of 30 kg N/ha after each cuttinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of fodder cowpea in sorghum did not affect the nutrient uptake of ratoon crops significantly than application of 30 kg N/ha after each cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping gave comparable nutrient uptake to 45 kg N/ha after each cutting.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Intercropping of fodder cowpeae1
Outcome
nutrient uptake of ratoon cropse1
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
application of 45 kg N/ha after each cuttinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was comparable with application of 45 kg N/ha after each cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–556 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercropping of fodder cowpea in sorghum did not affect the nutrient uptake of ratoon crops significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–434 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.