Paper · 2015 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Effect of Different Size of Broad Bed and Furrow on Runoff and Soil Loss and Productivity of Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) under Rainfed Conditions

P. D. Vekariya; D. P. Sanepara; B. B. Limbasia; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was initiated during rainy (kharif) season of 2003-04 to 2009-10 in medium black soil at Main Dry Farming Research Station, Targhadia (Rajkot), Gujarat, India to evaluate the different size of broad bed and furrow on the surface runoff and soil loss and productivity of groundnut which is the main crop of Saurashtra. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications having 4 treatments viz., flat bed (45 cm row spacing), broad bed (60 cm width) and furrow (30 cm) with 2 rows, broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows, broad bed (120 cm width) and furrow (60 cm) with 4 rows in runoff plot. Pooled results revealed significantly highest pod (932 kg ha-1) and haulm (3234 kg ha-1) yield under the broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows along with the minimum runoff (22.73%) and soil loss (483.40 kg ha-1). Higher mean soil moisture content (25.87% and 26.25%) was recorded under the both soil depths 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm, respectively under the broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows, while lowest (24.24% and 24.87%) were recorded in the flat bed control. The broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows also gave the highest net returns of ` 23662 ha-1 with the benefit: cost ratio of 2.69.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90 cm bed and 45 cm furrow had the highest groundnut pod yield of 932 kg ha-1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
pode1
Direction
higheste1
Value
932 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly highest pod (932 kg ha-1) and haulm (3234 kg ha-1) yield under the broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same arrangement had the highest haulm yield of 3234 kg ha-1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
haulme1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3234 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly highest pod (932 kg ha-1) and haulm (3234 kg ha-1) yield under the broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same arrangement had minimum runoff of 22.73%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
runoffe1
Direction
minimume1
Value
22.73%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows along with the minimum runoff (22.73%) and soil loss (483.40 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same arrangement had minimum soil loss of 483.40 kg ha-1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
soil losse1
Direction
minimume1
Value
483.40 kg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows along with the minimum runoff (22.73%) and soil loss (483.40 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture at 0-15 cm was higher under the 90 cm bed and 45 cm furrow, at 25.87% versus 24.24% in flat beds.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
soil moisture contente1
Direction
Highere1
Value
25.87%e1
Qualifier
0-15 cme1
Comparator
flat bed controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher mean soil moisture content (25.87% and 26.25%) was recorded under the both soil depths 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm, respectively under the broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows, while lowest (24.24% and 24.87%) were recorded in the flat bed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture at 15-30 cm was higher under the same arrangement, at 26.25% versus 24.87% in flat beds.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
soil moisture contente1
Direction
Highere1
Value
26.25%e1
Qualifier
15-30 cme1
Comparator
flat bed controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher mean soil moisture content (25.87% and 26.25%) was recorded under the both soil depths 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm, respectively under the broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows, while lowest (24.24% and 24.87%) were recorded in the flat bed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same arrangement gave the highest net returns of ` 23662 ha-1.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
` 23662 ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“The broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows also gave the highest net returns of ` 23662 ha-1 with the benefit: cost ratio of 2.69”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1299 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same arrangement had a benefit: cost ratio of 2.69.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rowse1
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe1
Value
2.69e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–298 · show in text ↑
e1

“The broad bed (90 cm width) and furrow (45 cm) with 3 rows also gave the highest net returns of ` 23662 ha-1 with the benefit: cost ratio of 2.69”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1299 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 168 positive, 23 negative or no effect

167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.