Paper · 2017 · Folia Horticulturae

The influence of ethephon application to processing tomato plants on yield structure in relation to weather conditions during the growing period

Elżbieta Jędrszczyk; Barbara Skowera; Renata Kędzior; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of ethephon application (Agrostym 480 SL) on the yield and yield structure of five processing tomato cultivars (Rumba, Hubal, Sokal F 1 , Mieszko F 1 and Polset F 1 ). The experiment was carried out in the open field in the years 2009-2011 in Mydlniki near Kraków, Poland. Two weeks before harvesting, half of the plants of each cultivar were treated with Agrostym 480 SL (3 dm 3 ha -1 ) and the other half were left as a control without spraying. Marketable yield included properly shaped and welldeveloped light red and red fruits. Non-marketable yield included pink and turning fruits, mature green and breaker fruits, and diseased fruits. A generalized linear model (GLM) for Poisson distribution with the log link function was used to determine the relationship between the years of the study and cultivar and selected values of the yield structure. The yield structure of tomato depended significantly on the weather conditions during the growing period in different years of the study, on the cultivar, and on the use of ethephon. Ethephon had a particularly beneficial effect on yield structure in the years with an unfavourable distribution of precipitation. Ethephon application in the years 2009 and 2010 had a beneficial effect on the health of tomato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield structure varied significantly with weather across study years.

Outcome
yield structuree0
Setting
different years of the studye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield structure of tomato depended significantly on the weather conditions during the growing period in different years of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1048 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield structure varied significantly by cultivar.

Material
cultivare0
Outcome
yield structuree0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield structure of tomato depended significantly on the weather conditions during the growing period in different years of the study, on the cultivar, and on the use of ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon significantly affected tomato yield structure.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
yield structuree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield structure of tomato depended significantly on the weather conditions during the growing period in different years of the study, on the cultivar, and on the use of ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon benefited tomato yield structure particularly in years with unfavorable precipitation.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
yield structuree0
Direction
beneficial effecte0
Qualifier
years with an unfavourable distribution of precipitatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon had a particularly beneficial effect on yield structure in the years with an unfavourable distribution of precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon benefited tomato plant health in 2009 and 2010.

Treatment
Ethephon applicatione0
Outcome
health of tomato plantse0
Direction
beneficial effecte0
Qualifier
years 2009 and 2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon application in the years 2009 and 2010 had a beneficial effect on the health of tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1327 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · organism · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.