Paper · 2017 · Journal of Nematology

Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida

Johan Desaeger; Donald W. Dickson; S. J. Locascio

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The following work was initiated to determine the scope of application methodology and fumigant combinations for increasing efficacy of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and metam sodium for management of root-knot nematodes ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Florida. A series of five experiments were set up during spring and fall seasons to evaluate the potential of different fumigants, alone or in combination, in polyethylene film tomato production. The most promising chemical alternatives to methyl bromide, in terms of root-knot nematode management, were the combinations 1,3-D-chloropicrin, chloropicrin-proprietary solvent, and 1,3-D-metam sodium. Sprayed or injected metam sodium generally provided only short-term nematode management and by harvest nematode infection was not different from the nontreated control. Drip-applied metam sodium gave good nematode management under high nematode pressure, but needs further verification to establish (i) the importance of soil moisture and temperature on treatment efficacy and (ii) whether similar management can be obtained with fewer than three drip tubes. Broadcast applications of 1,3-D showed better efficacy as compared to applications on a preformed raised bed. Fumigation did not increase tomato yields in spring when root-knot nematode pressure was low, but during fall all chemical treatments increased yields three to five-fold, as root-knot nematode was a major yield-limiting factor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three combinations were the most promising methyl bromide alternatives for nematode management.

Interactor
Root-knot NematodeMeloidogynet0pathogene0
Outcome
most promising chemical alternatives to methyl bromidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most promising chemical alternatives to methyl bromide, in terms of root-knot nematode management, were the combinations 1,3-D-chloropicrin, chloropicrin-proprietary solvent, and 1,3-D-metam sodium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed or injected metam sodium provided only short-term nematode management.

Treatment
Sprayed or injected metam sodiume0
Interactor
Root-knot NematodeMeloidogynet0pathogene0
Outcome
nematode managemente0
Qualifier
only short-terme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprayed or injected metam sodium generally provided only short-term nematode management and by harvest nematode infection was not different from the nontreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, nematode infection after sprayed or injected metam sodium did not differ from untreated control.

Treatment
Sprayed or injected metam sodiume0
Interactor
Root-knot NematodeMeloidogynet0pathogene0
Outcome
nematode infectione0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
nontreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprayed or injected metam sodium generally provided only short-term nematode management and by harvest nematode infection was not different from the nontreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip-applied metam sodium managed nematodes well under high pressure.

Treatment
Drip-applied metam sodiume0
Interactor
Root-knot NematodeMeloidogynet0pathogene0
Outcome
nematode managemente0
Qualifier
under high nematode pressuree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip-applied metam sodium gave good nematode management under high nematode pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast 1,3-D was more effective than application on a preformed raised bed.

Treatment
Broadcast applications of 1,3-De0
Interactor
Root-knot NematodeMeloidogynet0pathogene0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
applications on a preformed raised bede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast applications of 1,3-D showed better efficacy as compared to applications on a preformed raised bed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation did not raise tomato yield in spring with low nematode pressure.

Treatment
Fumigatione0
Interactor
Root-knot NematodeMeloidogynet0pathogene0
Outcome
tomato yieldse0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
in spring when root-knot nematode pressure was lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fumigation did not increase tomato yields in spring when root-knot nematode pressure was low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Root-knot Nematode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In fall all chemical treatments increased tomato yield three to five-fold.

Treatment
all chemical treatmentse0
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee0pathogen
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
three to five-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during fall all chemical treatments increased yields three to five-fold, as root-knot nematode was a major yield-limiting factor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Methyl Bromide Alternatives for Control of Root-knot Nematode ( Meloidogyne spp.) in Tomato Production in Florida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑

metam-sodium · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

solarization · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

transplanting · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.