Paper · 2017 · Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias - Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) response to boronin contrasting soil acidity conditions

J.Z. Barbosa; A.C.V. Motta; R. Consalter; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Wheat cultivation in acid soils may be simultaneously limited by metal toxicity, deficiency or Ca and Mg imbalance, and B deficiency. The aim of the present study is to assess whether the wheat response to B increases, as the crop condition in the acid soil becomes more stressful. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and an Oxisol sample was used as the substrate. It assessed the interaction between three soil acidity treatments (low [pH-CaCl2 5.6], very high [pH-CaCl2 4.2] and very high acidity with gypsum [pH-CaCl2 4.3]) and five B treatments (0, 0.15, 0.40; 1.25 and 3.50 mg dm-3). The very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soil caused a nutritional imbalance in wheat (mainly to Mg) and led to lower dry matter accumulation values, a condition in which B presented stress alleviation. Such condition resulted in significant changes in root growth, transpiration and the availability of Mg and Ca/Mg ratio in the rhizosphere soil. The concentration of K, Ca, Mg, P, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and Al was little affected by B, since the K:Mg ratio was more important. The treatment with very high acidity, with gypsum, also showed higher B toxicity. Thus, wheat has shown higher B response in acid soil under the most stressful condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High gypsum addition to very acid soil caused nutritional imbalance, mainly involving Mg, in wheat.

Treatment
very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soile0
Outcome
nutritional imbalancee0
Qualifier
mainly to Mge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soil caused a nutritional imbalance in wheat (mainly to Mg) and led to lower dry matter accumulation values, a condition in which B presented stress alleviation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High gypsum addition to very acid soil lowered wheat dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soile0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soil caused a nutritional imbalance in wheat (mainly to Mg) and led to lower dry matter accumulation values, a condition in which B presented stress alleviation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B alleviated stress in wheat under high gypsum addition to very acid soil.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
stress alleviatione0
Qualifier
very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soil caused a nutritional imbalance in wheat (mainly to Mg) and led to lower dry matter accumulation values, a condition in which B presented stress alleviation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The stressful gypsum and acidity condition significantly changed wheat root growth and transpiration.

Treatment
very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soile1
Outcome
root growth, transpiratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Such condition resulted in significant changes in root growth, transpiration and the availability of Mg and Ca/Mg ratio in the rhizosphere soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“The very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soil caused a nutritional imbalance in wheat (mainly to Mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The stressful gypsum and acidity condition significantly changed rhizosphere Mg availability and Ca/Mg ratio.

Treatment
very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soile1
Outcome
availability of Mg and Ca/Mg ratio in the rhizosphere soile0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Such condition resulted in significant changes in root growth, transpiration and the availability of Mg and Ca/Mg ratio in the rhizosphere soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“The very high addition of gypsum into a very acid soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B little affected wheat K, Ca and Mg concentrations.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
K, Ca, Mge0
Qualifier
little affectede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of K, Ca, Mg, P, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and Al was little affected by B, since the K:Mg ratio was more important.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B little affected wheat P, Fe and Mn concentrations.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
P, Fe, Mne0
Qualifier
little affectede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of K, Ca, Mg, P, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and Al was little affected by B, since the K:Mg ratio was more important.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B little affected wheat Zn, Cu and Al concentrations.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
Zn, Cu and Ale0
Qualifier
little affectede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of K, Ca, Mg, P, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and Al was little affected by B, since the K:Mg ratio was more important.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The K:Mg ratio was more important in explaining the limited concentration response to B.

Outcome
concentratione0
Qualifier
K:Mg ratio was more importante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of K, Ca, Mg, P, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu and Al was little affected by B, since the K:Mg ratio was more important.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very high acidity with gypsum produced higher B toxicity in wheat.

Treatment
very high acidity, with gypsume0
Outcome
B toxicitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment with very high acidity, with gypsum, also showed higher B toxicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat showed higher B response in acid soil under the most stressful condition.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
B responsee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in acid soil under the most stressful conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, wheat has shown higher B response in acid soil under the most stressful condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1246 · show in text ↑

lime · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ph · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 9 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

ph · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.