Paper · 1979

A comparison of height growth and leaf parameters of hybrid poplar cuttings grown in ozone-fumigated atmospheres

Keith F. Jensen

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Hybrid poplar cuttings were fumigated with an ozone dosage of 15 ppm-hours. One treatment was a steady fumigation at 0.2 ppm while the second fumigation fluctuated between 0.1 and 0.3 ppm. No significant differences were found in cutting height, leaf area, leaf width, and leaf dry weight, but significant differences were found in chlorophyll content and carbohydrate content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Steady and fluctuating ozone fumigation did not significantly differ for cutting height, leaf area, leaf width, or leaf dry weight.

Taxon
Hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
steady fumigation at 0.2 ppme0
Outcome
cutting height, leaf area, leaf width, and leaf dry weighte0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
second fumigation fluctuated between 0.1 and 0.3 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One treatment was a steady fumigation at 0.2 ppm while the second fumigation fluctuated between 0.1 and 0.3 ppm. No significant differences were found in cutting height, leaf area, leaf width, and leaf dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ozone fumigation patterns differed significantly in chlorophyll content and carbohydrate content.

Taxon
Hybrid poplarPopulust0
Treatment
steady fumigation at 0.2 ppme0
Outcome
chlorophyll content and carbohydrate contente0
Comparator
second fumigation fluctuated between 0.1 and 0.3 ppme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One treatment was a steady fumigation at 0.2 ppm while the second fumigation fluctuated between 0.1 and 0.3 ppm. No significant differences were found in cutting height, leaf area, leaf width, and leaf dry weight, but significant differences were found in chlorophyll content and carbohydrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 76–377 · show in text ↑
t0

“hybrid poplar cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–75 · show in text ↑

solarization · growth · Populus (poplar)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.