Paper · 2011 · The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Influence of zinc and iron on yield and quality of sugarcane planted under various trench spacings.

Abdul Ghaffar; Ehsanullah; Nadeem Akbar; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

-1 , along with a check. Different trench spacing and levels of zinc and iron significantly affected the yield and all the quality parameters of sugarcane crop except cane juice purity. Crop planted at 120 cm spaced trenches produced the maximum yield of stripped cane in both years. Sub plot treatment with applied Zn+Fe @ 5.0+10 Kg ha -1 gave the maximum stripped cane yield of 106.4 & 110.4 t ha -1 during 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively. The higher sucrose contents (18.61%) were obtained with foliar application of 5.0+10 Kg ha -1 of Zn+Fe, while 90 cm and 120 cm apart trenches gave similar sucrose contents but the higher than 75 cm apart trenches. The maximum sugar yield of 14.97 t ha -1 was obtained from crop grown at 120 cm spaced trenches. Foliar application of zinc and iron @ 5+10 kg ha -1 provided higher sugar yield of 15.25 t ha

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trench spacing and zinc and iron levels significantly affected cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Different trench spacing and levels of zinc and irone0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Different trench spacing and levels of zinc and iron significantly affected the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trench spacing and zinc and iron levels significantly affected quality parameters other than cane juice purity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Different trench spacing and levels of zinc and irone0
Outcome
all the quality parameterse0
Qualifier
except cane juice puritye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Different trench spacing and levels of zinc and iron significantly affected the yield and all the quality parameters of sugarcane crop except cane juice purity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane juice purity was an exception to the significant quality effects.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Different trench spacing and levels of zinc and irone1
Outcome
cane juice puritye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly affected the yield and all the quality parameters of sugarcane crop except cane juice purity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–184 · show in text ↑
e1

“Different trench spacing and levels of zinc and iron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane at 120 cm trench spacing had maximum stripped cane yield in both years.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
120 cm spaced trenchese0
Outcome
yield of stripped canee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Crop planted at 120 cm spaced trenches produced the maximum yield of stripped cane in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied Zn and Fe produced maximum stripped cane yield of 106.4 t ha -1 in 2007–08.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
applied Zn+Fe @ 5.0+10 Kg ha -1e0
Outcome
stripped cane yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
106.4 & 110.4 t ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“applied Zn+Fe @ 5.0+10 Kg ha -1 gave the maximum stripped cane yield of 106.4 & 110.4 t ha -1 during 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and Fe yielded higher sucrose content of 18.61%.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
foliar application of 5.0+10 Kg ha -1 of Zn+Fee0
Outcome
sucrose contentse0
Direction
highere0
Value
18.61%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“The higher sucrose contents (18.61%) were obtained with foliar application of 5.0+10 Kg ha -1 of Zn+Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane at 90 and 120 cm spacing had similar sucrose contents, higher than at 75 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
90 cm and 120 cm apart trenchese0
Outcome
sucrose contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75 cm apart trenchese0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“90 cm and 120 cm apart trenches gave similar sucrose contents but the higher than 75 cm apart trenches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane at 120 cm spacing had maximum sugar yield of 14.97 t ha -1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
120 cm spaced trenchese0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.97 t ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum sugar yield of 14.97 t ha -1 was obtained from crop grown at 120 cm spaced trenches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–753 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn and Fe provided higher sugar yield of 15.25 t ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Foliar application of zinc and iron @ 5+10 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15.25 t hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of zinc and iron @ 5+10 kg ha -1 provided higher sugar yield of 15.25 t ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–848 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
    Cane yield with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium plus sulphur, zinc, iron and manganese was at par with that with sulphur, zinc and iron.

    Yield and quality of sugarcane influenced by various plant nutrients · 2016 · compared with applications of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium along with sulphur, zinc and iron

    No difference from an alternative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

iron atom · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.