Paper · 2009 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of polyethylene mulch on soil nutrient level and root, leaf and fruiting characteristics of mango (Mangifera indica)

Virendra Singh; Gorakh Singh; S.R. Bhriguvanshi

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A study was conducted during 2004-08 on the impact of black polyethylene film (100 μ thick) on root growth, flowering and fruiting characteristics and nutritional and hydrothermal properties of soil, anatomical changes in roots and pedicel and ;stomatal behaviour of leaves in 'Chausa' and 'Langra' mango (Mangifetra indica L.). Mulching treatment stimulated the lateral root growth in nutrient rich upper soil layer in particular. The anatomical structure of roots of mulched trees showed more unicellular and tubular root hairs with prominent conductive tissue compared to non-mulched ones. Primitive abscission zone in the pedicels with increase in size of stomatal pore in leaves of mulched tree was categorically noticed. Enhancement in flowering (35 to 50%), maximum fruit retention (381.61 and 566.47) and minimum fruit drop (14 and 51) with enhancement in yield (82.60 and 117.50 kg/tree) in both the cultivars was recorded in mulched trees compared with the non-mulched ones. Alleviated soil temperature (21.0-25.8) was also noticed in the mulching treatments. The data on nutritional status clearly revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars with different magnitude with mulching. However there was no significant changes in Mn level, pH of soil, organic content in mulched as compared to non-mulched soil. Significant increase with cultivars variation in gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence was recorded in mulched trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching stimulated lateral root growth in the nutrient-rich upper soil layer of mango

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
lateral roote0
Treatment
Mulching treatmente0
Outcome
lateral root growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
nutrient rich upper soil layere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mulching treatment stimulated the lateral root growth in nutrient rich upper soil layer in particular”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched mango trees had more unicellular and tubular root hairs with prominent conductive tissue than non-mulched trees

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
mulched treese1
Outcome
unicellular and tubular root hairs with prominent conductive tissuee1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
non-mulched onese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“The anatomical structure of roots of mulched trees showed more unicellular and tubular root hairs with prominent conductive tissue compared to non-mulched ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–591 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A primitive abscission zone was noticed in the pedicels of mulched mango trees

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
pedicelse2
Treatment
mulched treee2
Outcome
Primitive abscission zone in the pedicelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“Primitive abscission zone in the pedicels with increase in size of stomatal pore in leaves of mulched tree was categorically noticed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched mango trees had larger stomatal pores in leaves

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
mulched treee2
Outcome
size of stomatal pore in leavese2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“Primitive abscission zone in the pedicels with increase in size of stomatal pore in leaves of mulched tree was categorically noticed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching enhanced flowering of mango by 35 to 50%

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Treatment
mulched treese3
Outcome
floweringe3
Direction
Enhancemente3
Value
35 to 50%e3
Comparator
non-mulched onese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“Enhancement in flowering (35 to 50%), maximum fruit retention (381.61 and 566.47) and minimum fruit drop (14 and 51) with enhancement in yield (82.60 and 117.50 kg/tree) in both the cultivars was recorded in mulched trees compared with the non-mulched ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave maximum fruit retention in mango (381.61 and 566.47)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Treatment
mulched treese3
Outcome
fruit retentione3
Direction
maximume3
Value
381.61 and 566.47e3
Comparator
non-mulched onese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“Enhancement in flowering (35 to 50%), maximum fruit retention (381.61 and 566.47) and minimum fruit drop (14 and 51) with enhancement in yield (82.60 and 117.50 kg/tree) in both the cultivars was recorded in mulched trees compared with the non-mulched ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching gave minimum fruit drop in mango (14 and 51)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Treatment
mulched treese3
Outcome
fruit drope3
Direction
minimume3
Value
14 and 51e3
Comparator
non-mulched onese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“Enhancement in flowering (35 to 50%), maximum fruit retention (381.61 and 566.47) and minimum fruit drop (14 and 51) with enhancement in yield (82.60 and 117.50 kg/tree) in both the cultivars was recorded in mulched trees compared with the non-mulched ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching enhanced mango yield (82.60 and 117.50 kg/tree)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Treatment
mulched treese3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
enhancemente3
Value
82.60 and 117.50 kg/treee3
Comparator
non-mulched onese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“Enhancement in flowering (35 to 50%), maximum fruit retention (381.61 and 566.47) and minimum fruit drop (14 and 51) with enhancement in yield (82.60 and 117.50 kg/tree) in both the cultivars was recorded in mulched trees compared with the non-mulched ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching alleviated soil temperature under mango trees (21.0-25.8)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Treatment
mulching treatmentse4
Outcome
soil temperaturee4
Direction
Alleviatede4
Value
21.0-25.8e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“Alleviated soil temperature (21.0-25.8) was also noticed in the mulching treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1068 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved the soil and leaf level of N in mango (2.50%)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
soil and leavese5
Outcome
level of Ne5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
2.50%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1293 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved the soil and leaf level of P in mango (18.69 ppm)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
soil and leavese5
Outcome
Pe5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
18.69 ppme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1293 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved the soil and leaf level of K in mango (130.0 ppm)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
soil and leavese5
Outcome
Ke5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
130.0 ppme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1293 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved the soil and leaf level of Ca in mango (521.95 ppm)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
soil and leavese5
Outcome
Cae5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
521.95 ppme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1293 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved the soil and leaf level of Zn in mango (0.93 ppm)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
soil and leavese5
Outcome
Zne5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
0.93 ppme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1293 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved the soil and leaf level of Cu in mango (1.61 ppm)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
soil and leavese5
Outcome
Cue5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
1.61 ppme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1293 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching improved the soil and leaf level of Fe in mango (4.90 ppm)

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Organ / stage
soil and leavese5
Outcome
Fee5
Direction
improvemente5
Value
4.90 ppme5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“revealed the improvement in the level of N (2.50%), P (18.69 ppm), K (130.0 ppm), Ca (521.95 ppm), Zn (0.93 ppm), Cu (1.61 ppm), Fe (4.90 ppm), in soil and leaves in both the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching did not significantly change Mn level, soil pH or organic content in mango soil

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Treatment
mulchede6
Outcome
Mn level, pH of soil, organic contente6
Direction
no significant changese6
Comparator
non-mulched soile6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e6

“However there was no significant changes in Mn level, pH of soil, organic content in mulched as compared to non-mulched soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulched mango trees had significantly increased gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence, varying by cultivar

Taxon
Mangifera indicaMangifera indicat0
Treatment
mulched treese7
Outcome
gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescencee7
Direction
Significant increasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mango (Mangifera indica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“Significant increase with cultivars variation in gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence was recorded in mulched trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1591 · show in text ↑

mulching · nutrient: content · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mulching · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.