Paper · 2011

Assessment of cowpea genotypes for variability to drought tolerance.

R. M. Chiulele; Gichuki Philip Mwangi; P. Tongoona; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Genetic variability is a pre-requisite for establishment of any breeding programme. Hundred and thirty six (136) cowpea genotypes were grown under drought-stress and non-stress conditions at Chokwe Research Station, Mozambique, from June to October 2008, to assess their variability in drought tolerance. Drought stress was applied from flowering to physiological maturity on stress treatment plants. On the other hand, non-stressed treatment plants, were watered regularly throughout the experiment. Data were recorded on yield and yield components (number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod and 100-seed weight) at physiological maturity. Quantitative indices of stress tolerance were calculated from yield data (tolerance index, mean productivity, geometric mean productivity, stress intensity, stress susceptibility index and stress tolerance index). Data analysis was performed using the Mixed Model Residual Maximum likelihood (REML), correlations and multivariate analysis conducted on stressed and non-stressed yield. Drought stress reduced yields, but genotypes responded differently to the stress imposed indicating variability in drought tolerance. Biplot displays of quantitative indices of stress tolerance and yield showed that genotypes were distributed over the coordinate space indicating variability in yield and drought tolerance amongst the tested germplasm. Genotypes were grouped into four categories; (i) high yielding-drought tolerant, (ii) high yielding-drought susceptible, (iii) low yielding-drought tolerant, and (iv) low yielding-drought susceptible. This genetic variability in drought stress provides scope for cowpea genetic improvement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced cowpea yields.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
non-stress conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress reduced yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea genotypes were grown under drought-stress and non-stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–187 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotypes differed in their drought stress response.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Direction
variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes responded differently to the stress imposed indicating variability in drought tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biplots showed variability in yield among tested cowpea germplasm.

Material
tested germplasme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biplot displays of quantitative indices of stress tolerance and yield showed that genotypes were distributed over the coordinate space indicating variability in yield and drought tolerance amongst the tested germplasm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1386 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biplots showed variability in drought tolerance among tested cowpea germplasm.

Material
tested germplasme0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Direction
variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biplot displays of quantitative indices of stress tolerance and yield showed that genotypes were distributed over the coordinate space indicating variability in yield and drought tolerance amongst the tested germplasm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1386 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–129 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotypes were classified into four yield and drought tolerance categories.

Outcome
grouped into four categoriese0
Value
foure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotypes were grouped into four categories; (i) high yielding-drought tolerant, (ii) high yielding-drought susceptible, (iii) low yielding-drought tolerant, and (iv) low yielding-drought susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1587 · show in text ↑
e1

“cowpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–129 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that drought tolerance variability offers scope for cowpea genetic improvement.

Outcome
cowpea genetic improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This genetic variability in drought stress provides scope for cowpea genetic improvement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1677 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.