Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Postharvest Treatment of Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Fruits with Boric Acid and NAA for Quality Regulation during Ambient Storage

Jatinder Singh; Narendra Prasad; Shailesh Kumar Singh

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Guava fruit exhibits a climacteric pattern of respiration and ethylene production so is highly perishable in nature and suffers great extent of post-harvest loss. Storage of guava fruits by using chemicals like GA3, Salicylic acid, NAA, potassium permanganate and boric acid as postharvest treatment is commercially acceptable and economically feasible. The present investigation was carried out with objective to compare the efficacy of boric acid and NAA and their most effective concentration for shelf-life enhancement of guava fruits in winter season. The fruit of guava, cv. Allahabad Safeda were harvested, selected for uniformity of size, colour and diseased fruits were discarded. Prior to the application of post-harvest treatments, destalking of the fruits was done by retaining only 0.5 cm long pedicels in each fruit. The destalked guava fruits were sorted and pre cooled in running water for 12−15 minutes. Fruits were treated with Boric acid @ 100 ppm, 200 ppm and 300 ppm, NAA @ 200 ppm, 300 ppm and 400 ppm for 1−2 minutes. The physical parameters like fruit size, fruit weight, physiological weight loss, decay of fruits and specific gravity; chemical parameters like TSS, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid and sugar content; and palatability rating were observed and compared with untreated fruits. Both, boric acid and NAA, had significantly affected the shelf life of guava fruits stored under ambient condition. Boric Acid 200 ppm and 300 ppm were equally effective, similarly NAA 300 ppm and 400 ppm were equally effective for quality retention in guava fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid and NAA significantly affected the shelf life of guava fruits stored under ambient condition compared with untreated fruits.

Treatment
boric acid and NAAe0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Comparator
untreated fruitse1
Setting
ambient conditione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both, boric acid and NAA, had significantly affected the shelf life of guava fruits stored under ambient condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with untreated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1316 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boric acid at 200 ppm and 300 ppm were equally effective for quality retention in guava fruits.

Treatment
Boric Acid 200 ppme2
Outcome
quality retentione2
Direction
equally effectivee2
Comparator
300 ppme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Boric Acid 200 ppm and 300 ppm were equally effective, similarly NAA 300 ppm and 400 ppm were equally effective for quality retention in guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 300 ppm and 400 ppm were equally effective for quality retention in guava fruits.

Treatment
NAA 300 ppme2
Outcome
quality retentione2
Direction
equally effectivee2
Comparator
400 ppme2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Boric Acid 200 ppm and 300 ppm were equally effective, similarly NAA 300 ppm and 400 ppm were equally effective for quality retention in guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1583 · show in text ↑

boric acid · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

boric acid · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: general · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.