Paper · 2017 · Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences

Effect of Irradiation on Vitamin C, Acidity and Moisture Content of Mango Fruits with Gamma Ray from Cobalt-60 Source

Idodo Maxwell; Ali Haruna; Adamu Baba-Kutigi; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In this study four varieties of mango fruits were irradiated with Gamma ray from Cobalt-60 source at different dose points of 50 Gy, 100 Gy, 300 Gy and 800 Gy in order to investigate the effect of irradiation on vitamin C, titreable acidity and moisture content. Studies indicate that the dose point of 0.05 KGy (sample A) and 0.10 KGy (sample B) gained an average vitamin C content of 6.88% and 6.27% respectively while the dose point of 0.30 KGy showed no loss or gained of vitamin C content and the dose point of 0.80 KGy (sample D) loss 56.25% of vitamin C as compared to reference point (un-irradiated or control sample). The values of titreable acidity which was high on day 2 decreases at day 10 and later increases at day 17. This is attributed to an increase in pulp acidity which occurred as the ripening process proceeds. Also a study reveals that irradiation has no effect on moisture content of mango fruit but can delay the rate of respiration thus the ripening and shelf life.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.05 KGy irradiation, mango fruit vitamin C content gained 6.88% relative to control.

Taxon
Mango FruitsMangifera indicat0
Treatment
0.05 KGye0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
gainede0
Value
6.88%e0
Comparator
un-irradiated or control samplee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“the dose point of 0.05 KGy (sample A) and 0.10 KGy (sample B) gained an average vitamin C content of 6.88% and 6.27% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to reference point (un-irradiated or control sample)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.10 KGy irradiation, mango fruit vitamin C content gained 6.27% relative to control.

Taxon
Mango FruitsMangifera indicat0
Treatment
0.10 KGye0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
gainede0
Value
6.27%e0
Comparator
un-irradiated or control samplee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“the dose point of 0.05 KGy (sample A) and 0.10 KGy (sample B) gained an average vitamin C content of 6.88% and 6.27% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–414 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to reference point (un-irradiated or control sample)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.30 KGy irradiation, mango fruit vitamin C showed no loss or gain.

Taxon
Mango FruitsMangifera indicat0
Treatment
0.30 KGye0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
no loss or gainede0
Comparator
un-irradiated or control samplee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“the dose point of 0.30 KGy showed no loss or gained of vitamin C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to reference point (un-irradiated or control sample)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.80 KGy irradiation, mango fruit vitamin C fell 56.25% relative to control.

Taxon
Mango FruitsMangifera indicat0
Treatment
0.80 KGye0
Outcome
vitamin Ce0
Direction
losse0
Value
56.25%e0
Comparator
un-irradiated or control samplee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“the dose point of 0.80 KGy (sample D) loss 56.25% of vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to reference point (un-irradiated or control sample)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango fruit titreable acidity decreased from day 2 to day 10.

Taxon
Mango FruitsMangifera indicat0
Outcome
titreable aciditye0
Direction
decreasese0
Qualifier
day 10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The values of titreable acidity which was high on day 2 decreases at day 10 and later increases at day 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–733 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango fruit titreable acidity increased by day 17.

Taxon
Mango FruitsMangifera indicat0
Outcome
titreable aciditye0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
day 17e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
e0

“The values of titreable acidity which was high on day 2 decreases at day 10 and later increases at day 17.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation had no reported effect on mango fruit moisture content.

Taxon
mango fruitMangifera indicae0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irradiation has no effect on moisture content of mango fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation delayed mango fruit respiration and ripening.

Taxon
mango fruitMangifera indicae0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
rate of respiratione0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irradiation has no effect on moisture content of mango fruit but can delay the rate of respiration thus the ripening and shelf life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation could delay mango fruit ripening and shelf life.

Taxon
mango fruitMangifera indicae0
Treatment
irradiatione0
Outcome
ripening and shelf lifee0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irradiation has no effect on moisture content of mango fruit but can delay the rate of respiration thus the ripening and shelf life.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–991 · show in text ↑

radiation · physiology: respiration · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

radiation · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

18 papers: 11 positive, 7 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

radiation · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.