Paper · 2017 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Predicting Flowering Behavior and Exploring Its Genetic Determinism in an Apple Multi-family Population Based on Statistical Indices and Simplified Phenotyping

Jean-Baptiste Durand; Alix Allard; Baptiste Guitton; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
22
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Irregular flowering over years is commonly observed in fruit trees. The early prediction of tree behaviour is highly desirable in breeding programmes. This study aims at performing such predictions, combining simplified phenotyping and statistics methods. Sequences of vegetative vs. floral annual shoots (AS) were observed along axes in trees belonging to five apple related full-sib families. Sequences were analysed using Markovian and linear mixed models including year and site effects. Indices of flowering irregularity, periodicity and synchronicity were estimated, at tree and axis scales. They were used to predict tree behaviour and detect QTL with a Bayesian pedigree-based analysis, using an integrated genetic map containing 6,849 SNPs. The combination of a Biennial Bearing Index (BBI) with an autoregressive coefficient ( ) efficiently predicted and classified the genotype behaviours, despite few miss-classifications. Four QTLs common to BBIs and and one for synchronicity were highlighted and revealed the complex genetic architecture of the traits. Irregularity resulted from high AS synchronism, whereas regularity resulted from either asynchronous locally alternating or continual regular AS flowering. A relevant and time-saving method, based on a posteriori sampling of axes and statistical indices is proposed, which is efficient to evaluate the tree breeding values for flowering regularity and could be transferred to other species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined indices efficiently predicted and classified apple genotype flowering behavior, with some misclassifications.

Outcome
predicted and classified the genotype behaviourse0
Qualifier
despite few miss-classificationse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Multi-family Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of a Biennial Bearing Index (BBI) with an autoregressive coefficient ( ) efficiently predicted and classified the genotype behaviours, despite few miss-classifications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four QTLs were common to the two flowering irregularity indices.

Outcome
QTLs common to BBIs ande0
Value
Four QTLse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Multi-family Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Four QTLs common to BBIs and and one for synchronicity were highlighted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1006 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One QTL was highlighted for flowering synchronicity.

Outcome
synchronicitye0
Value
onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Multi-family Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“one for synchronicity were highlighted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1006 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering irregularity resulted from high annual shoot synchronism.

Outcome
Irregularitye0
Qualifier
high AS synchronisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Multi-family Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irregularity resulted from high AS synchronism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1114 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regular flowering resulted from asynchronous, locally alternating annual shoot flowering.

Outcome
regularitye0
Qualifier
asynchronous locally alternatinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Multi-family Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“regularity resulted from either asynchronous locally alternating or continual regular AS flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1222 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regular flowering also resulted from continual regular annual shoot flowering.

Outcome
regularitye0
Qualifier
continual regular AS floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Multi-family Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“regularity resulted from either asynchronous locally alternating or continual regular AS flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1222 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed axis sampling and indices method efficiently evaluates breeding values for flowering regularity and may transfer to other species.

Outcome
evaluate the tree breeding values for flowering regularitye0
Qualifier
could be transferred to other speciese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Multi-family Population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“A relevant and time-saving method, based on a posteriori sampling of axes and statistical indices is proposed, which is efficient to evaluate the tree breeding values for flowering regularity and could be transferred to other species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1458 · show in text ↑