Paper · 2004 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

STUDIES ON SEASONAL POPULATION FLUCTUATIONS OF APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE AND THEIR PREDATORS

Anil K. Sood

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Studies on the seasonal population fluctuation of the aphid pests ofcabbage and their predators were undertaken in treated and untreated plots during I994-95 and 1995496 cropping seasons at Pantnagar, North India. In the insecticides treated plots, four sprays of monocrotophos (0.04%) followed by two sprays of endosulfan (0.05%) were given at IO days interval. Three aphid species namely Myzus and Brevicrnyne brassicne Linn. were found to attack this crop. However, M. percicae was the most abundant aphid species. The pcak population of M. persicue was recorded on February l9, I995 (445.6 aphids/S plants) and January 25, I996 (364.20 aphids/5 plants) in untreated plots, while in the treated plots, its peak population occurred on February,12 I995 (70.10 aphids/5 plants) and January ll, I996 (166.70 aphids/5 plants), respectively. The population fluctuation of other aphid species is also discussed. The peak predator population in the untreated plots was in mid-March (2.90 individualsl 5 plants), a month later than in the treated plots (0.90 individuals/5 plants). However, the overall mean predator population in the treated plots (0.32) was significantly lower than that in the untreated plots (L43) during l994-95 cropping season and it was on par during I995-96 cropping season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plots had a Myzus persicae peak of 445.6 aphids per 5 plants on February 19, 1995.

Interactor
M. persicuee1pest
Outcome
populatione1
Value
445.6 aphids/S plantse1
Setting
untreated plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pcak population of M. persicue was recorded on February l9, I995 (445.6 aphids/S plants) and January 25, I996 (364.20 aphids/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–655 · show in text ↑
e2

“in untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–674 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plots had a Myzus persicae peak of 364.20 aphids per 5 plants on January 25, 1996.

Interactor
M. persicuee1pest
Outcome
populatione1
Value
364.20 aphids/5 plantse1
Setting
untreated plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pcak population of M. persicue was recorded on February l9, I995 (445.6 aphids/S plants) and January 25, I996 (364.20 aphids/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–655 · show in text ↑
e2

“in untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–674 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots had a Myzus persicae peak of 70.10 aphids per 5 plants on February 12, 1995 after insecticide sprays.

Treatment
insecticidese4
Interactor
M. persicuee1pest
Outcome
populatione3
Value
70.10 aphids/5 plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pcak population of M. persicue was recorded on February l9, I995 (445.6 aphids/S plants) and January 25, I996 (364.20 aphids/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–655 · show in text ↑
e3

“its peak population occurred on February,12 I995 (70.10 aphids/5 plants) and January ll, I996 (166.70 aphids/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–822 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the insecticides treated plots, four sprays of monocrotophos (0.04%) followed by two sprays of endosulfan (0.05%) were given at IO days interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots had a Myzus persicae peak of 166.70 aphids per 5 plants on January 11, 1996 after insecticide sprays.

Treatment
insecticidese4
Interactor
M. persicuee1pest
Outcome
populatione3
Value
166.70 aphids/5 plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pcak population of M. persicue was recorded on February l9, I995 (445.6 aphids/S plants) and January 25, I996 (364.20 aphids/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–655 · show in text ↑
e3

“its peak population occurred on February,12 I995 (70.10 aphids/5 plants) and January ll, I996 (166.70 aphids/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–822 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the insecticides treated plots, four sprays of monocrotophos (0.04%) followed by two sprays of endosulfan (0.05%) were given at IO days interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plots had a peak predator population of 2.90 individuals per 5 plants in mid-March, a month later than in treated plots.

Interactor
predatore5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
peak predator populatione5
Value
2.90 individualsl 5 plantse5
Setting
untreated plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE AND THEIR PREDATORS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“The peak predator population in the untreated plots was in mid-March (2.90 individualsl 5 plants), a month later than in the treated plots (0.90 individuals/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated plots had a peak predator population of 0.90 individuals per 5 plants after insecticide sprays.

Treatment
insecticidese4
Interactor
predatore5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
peak predator populatione5
Value
0.90 individuals/5 plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE AND THEIR PREDATORS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“The peak predator population in the untreated plots was in mid-March (2.90 individualsl 5 plants), a month later than in the treated plots (0.90 individuals/5 plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1072 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the insecticides treated plots, four sprays of monocrotophos (0.04%) followed by two sprays of endosulfan (0.05%) were given at IO days interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall mean predator population was significantly lower in insecticide-treated plots (0.32) than in untreated plots (1.43) in 1994-95.

Treatment
insecticidese4
Interactor
predatore6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
overall mean predator populatione6
Direction
lowere6
Value
0.32e6
Comparator
untreated plotse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE AND THEIR PREDATORS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the insecticides treated plots, four sprays of monocrotophos (0.04%) followed by two sprays of endosulfan (0.05%) were given at IO days interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–360 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, the overall mean predator population in the treated plots (0.32) was significantly lower than that in the untreated plots (L43) during l994-95 cropping season and it was on par during I995-96 cropping season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1995-96 the overall mean predator population was on par between insecticide-treated and untreated plots.

Treatment
insecticidese4
Interactor
predatore6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
overall mean predator populatione6
Direction
on pare6
Qualifier
during I995-96 cropping seasone6
Comparator
untreated plotse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE AND THEIR PREDATORS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the insecticides treated plots, four sprays of monocrotophos (0.04%) followed by two sprays of endosulfan (0.05%) were given at IO days interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–360 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, the overall mean predator population in the treated plots (0.32) was significantly lower than that in the untreated plots (L43) during l994-95 cropping season and it was on par during I995-96 cropping season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1290 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Myzus persicae was the most abundant of the aphid species attacking cabbage.

Interactor
M. percicaee7pest
Outcome
most abundant aphid speciese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APHID PESTS OF CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–69 · show in text ↑
e7

“M. percicae was the most abundant aphid species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–515 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.