Paper · 2014 · Phyton

Cladistics of Mexican nopal genotypes (Opuntia spp.) based on AFLP markers and fruit characters

Espinoza Sánchez EA; H Silos Espino; S Flores Benitez; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dendrograms were constructed based on AFLP markers and a table was used to group fruit characters of wild and cultivated genotypes of Mexican nopal (Opuntia spp.). The AFLP dendrogram obtained using ≈57.5 markers (from primers Mse I-CAC/Eco RI-AAG) did not agree with the known taxonomic classification for this species. Additionally, a complementary table for fruit characters (morphological and °Brix) showed a wide range for wild genotypes, e.g. from 21-22 °Brix for ‘Tapón Blanco’ and ‘Guilanche’ genotypes, to 5.0-8.2 °Brix for xoconostles (acidic fruits). Even though there were some divergences with taxonomic classification, it is expected that both genetic and physicochemical information would contribute to a more appropriate identification of Opuntia genotypes that, in turn, may be used in breeding programs of this genus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AFLP dendrogram disagreed with known taxonomic classification.

Taxon
Opuntia spp.Opuntiat0
Outcome
did not agree with the known taxonomic classificatione0
Comparator
known taxonomic classificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia
Opuntia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The AFLP dendrogram obtained using ≈57.5 markers (from primers Mse I-CAC/Eco RI-AAG) did not agree with the known taxonomic classification for this species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–319 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild nopal fruit characters showed a wide range.

Taxon
Opuntia spp.Opuntiat0
Material
wild genotypese0
Outcome
fruit characters (morphological and °Brix)e0
Direction
wide rangee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia
Opuntia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a complementary table for fruit characters (morphological and °Brix) showed a wide range for wild genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tapón Blanco and Guilanche fruit measured 21-22 °Brix.

Taxon
Opuntia spp.Opuntiat0
Outcome
°Brixe0
Value
21-22 °Brixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia
Opuntia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 21-22 °Brix for ‘Tapón Blanco’ and ‘Guilanche’ genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xoconostles measured 5.0-8.2 °Brix.

Taxon
Opuntia spp.Opuntiat0
Material
xoconostlese0
Outcome
°Brixe0
Value
5.0-8.2 °Brixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia
Opuntia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to 5.0-8.2 °Brix for xoconostles (acidic fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expected genetic and physicochemical information to improve genotype identification for breeding.

Taxon
Opuntia spp.Opuntiat0
Outcome
more appropriate identification of Opuntia genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia
Opuntia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JMK · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both genetic and physicochemical information would contribute to a more appropriate identification of Opuntia genotypes that, in turn, may be used in breeding programs of this genus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–51 · show in text ↑