Abstract
Cultivation of Cucumis melo is hampered by soil stresses. Grafting is used to overcome these limitations. Different cucurbits belonging to several genera have been used as rootstocks for melons: Cucurbita, Lagenaria, Luffa, etc. However, negative effects on fruit quality appear in some rootstock-scion combinations. The selection of new resistant rootstocks that do not cause this negative impact in quality is necessary to improve melon cultivation. In this work, we evaluated two rootstocks, closer genetically to melon scions than those usually employed: a) an F1 hybrid between a commercial melon (C. melo subspecies melo var inodorus market class Piel de Sapo) and one exotic accession (C. melo subspecies agrestis var. chinensis) with resistance to Monosporacus cannonballus, the causal agent of melon vine decline, and with a certain level of tolerance to Fusarium oxysporum f sp. melonis race 1.2, that causes Fusarium wilt, and b) an accession of Cucumis metuliferus, highly resistant to M. cannonballus, F. oxysporum 1.2 and evaluated and classified as highly resistant to Meloidogyne spp. in this work. Grafting compatibility of these two selected genotypes with commercial melons was good. All grafted plants displayed higher vigour and earlier flowering than ungrafted plants. Fruits from plants grafted onto C. metuliferus showed similar quality than those from ungrafted/selfgrafted plants. However, fruits from plants grafted onto the F1 (inodorus x chinensis) had in this experiment lower brix degree than the ungrafted controls. The resistance to soil borne pathogens found in C. metuliferus and the good performance regarding plant development and fruit quality of the scions indicate that this species is a promising rootstock for melons.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
C. metuliferus was classified as highly resistant to Meloidogyne spp.
- Taxon
- Cucumis metuliferus
Cucumis metuliferuse0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne spp.
Meloidogynee0pathogen - Outcome
- highly resistant to Meloidogyne spp.e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Cucumis metuliferus, highly resistant to M. cannonballus, F. oxysporum 1.2 and evaluated and classified as highly resistant to Meloidogyne spp. in this work”
Claim · model-written summary
Both selected genotypes had good grafting compatibility with commercial melons.
Verbatim
e0“Grafting compatibility of these two selected genotypes with commercial melons was good”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted plants had higher vigour and earlier flowering than ungrafted plants.
Verbatim
e0“All grafted plants displayed higher vigour and earlier flowering than ungrafted plants”
e1“commercial melons”
Claim · model-written summary
C. metuliferus grafting yielded similar fruit quality to ungrafted or selfgrafted plants.
- Taxon
- C. metuliferus
Cucumis metuliferuse0
- Treatment
- grafted onto C. metuliferuse0
- Outcome
- qualitye0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- ungrafted/selfgrafted plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fruits from plants grafted onto C. metuliferus showed similar quality than those from ungrafted/selfgrafted plants”
Claim · model-written summary
F1 rootstock grafting lowered fruit brix degree relative to ungrafted controls.
- Taxon
- melon
Cucumis meloe1 - Treatment
- grafted onto the F1 (inodorus x chinensis)e0
- Outcome
- brix degreee0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- ungrafted controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“fruits from plants grafted onto the F1 (inodorus x chinensis) had in this experiment lower brix degree than the ungrafted controls”
e1“melon scions”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.