Paper · 2007 · ScienceAsia

Jarunee Pilumwong; Chuckree Senthong; Sombat Srichuwong; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Continuing increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, [CO 2 ], will likely be accompanied by global warming. Thus, it is important to quantify and understand the consequences of elevated [CO 2 ] and temperature on crop growth and yield to develop suitable varieties and agronomic management practices for future climates. The objective of this study was to investigate the growth and development responses of shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) grown under different combinations of atmospheric [CO 2 ] and temperature. The study comprised a long-term experiment, in which plants were grown in growth chambers for 112 days, and a short-term experiment, in which growing plants in rhizotrons for 17 days. In the long-term experiment, peanut cultivar Tainan 9 was grown in 20-L containers fitted with minirhizotron observation tubes at 5 cm soil depth and placed in controlled environment chambers under three levels of [CO 2 ] (400, 600, and 800 mol mol -1 ) and two levels of air temperature (25/15C and 35/25C day/night temperature). In the short-term experiment, two peanut seedlings were grown in each of 18 acrylic rhizotrons with a 6-mm thick soil layer. Rhizotrons with plants were placed in the same growth chambers as above. At 3-to 4-day intervals, rhizotrons were placed on a flatbed scanner to collect digital images from which root length and number were measured using RMS software. At 25/15C, plants grown at 600 and 800 mol mol -1 CO 2 had main stems that were 24 and 44% longer than those grown at 400 mol mol -1 , while at 35/25C the main stem length was similar in all [CO 2 ] levels. At 25/15C, plants showed greater area and dry weight per leaf than at 35/25C. At harvest, high temperature significantly reduced total leaf area to 574 cm 2 for 35/ 25C compared with 921.2 cm 2 for 25/15C. Specific leaf area at low temperature was 22% less than at high temperature. Above ground biomass was increased by elevated CO 2 in both temperature treatments. At high temperature, above ground biomass was 56%, 24%, and 16% higher than at low temperature at [CO 2 ] of 400, 600 and 800 mol mol -1 , respectively. Pod dry weight increased with increasing [CO 2 ] at 25/15C, but was not different among [CO 2 ] levels at 35/25C. At 25/15C, pod dry weight was 50% higher than at 35/ 25C. As the temperature increased from 25/15C to 35/25C, pod dry weight was reduced by 40% at 400, 53% at 600, and 54% at 800 mol mol -1 CO 2 . High temperature produced more root length in the containers, whereas low temperature did in the rhizotrons. There were significant interactions between temperature and [CO 2 ] for their effects on main stem length and above ground biomass. High temperature enhanced growth of shoots and roots, but decreased pod dry weight. There was no interaction of elevated [CO 2 ] with higher temperature on the reproductive growth, despite a tendency for beneficial temperature by [CO 2 ] interaction on vegetative growth and total shoot dry weight. The beneficial effects of increased [CO 2 ] on photosynthesis and growth were overwhelmed by the negative effect of high temperature on reproductive growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25/15C, peanut main stems were 24% and 44% longer under 600 and 800 mol mol -1 CO2 than under 400 mol mol -1.

Treatment
600 and 800 mol mol -1 CO 2e1
Outcome
main stemse1
Direction
longere1
Value
24 and 44%e1
Qualifier
At 25/15Ce1
Comparator
400 mol mol -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e1

“At 25/15C, plants grown at 600 and 800 mol mol -1 CO 2 had main stems that were 24 and 44% longer than those grown at 400 mol mol -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 35/25C, main stem length of peanut was similar across CO2 levels.

Treatment
[CO 2 ] levelse2
Outcome
main stem lengthe2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
35/25Ce2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“while at 35/25C the main stem length was similar in all [CO 2 ] levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25/15C, peanut plants had greater leaf area and dry weight per leaf than at 35/25C.

Treatment
25/15Ce2
Outcome
area and dry weight per leafe2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
35/25Ce2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 25/15C, plants showed greater area and dry weight per leaf than at 35/25C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature significantly reduced total leaf area of peanut to 574 cm2 at 35/25C compared with 921.2 cm2 at 25/15C.

Treatment
high temperaturee3
Outcome
total leaf areae3
Direction
reducede3
Value
574 cm 2e3
Comparator
921.2 cm 2 for 25/15Ce3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e3

“At harvest, high temperature significantly reduced total leaf area to 574 cm 2 for 35/ 25C compared with 921.2 cm 2 for 25/15C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area of peanut at low temperature was 22% less than at high temperature.

Treatment
low temperaturee4
Outcome
Specific leaf areae4
Direction
lesse4
Value
22%e4
Comparator
high temperaturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e4

“Specific leaf area at low temperature was 22% less than at high temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above ground biomass of peanut was increased by elevated CO2 in both temperature treatments.

Treatment
elevated CO 2e5
Outcome
Above ground biomasse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e5

“Above ground biomass was increased by elevated CO 2 in both temperature treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–1993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high temperature, above ground biomass of peanut was 56%, 24% and 16% higher than at low temperature at 400, 600 and 800 mol mol -1 CO2.

Treatment
high temperaturee6
Outcome
above ground biomasse6
Direction
highere6
Value
56%, 24%, and 16%e6
Qualifier
at [CO 2 ] of 400, 600 and 800 mol mol -1e6
Comparator
low temperaturee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e6

“At high temperature, above ground biomass was 56%, 24%, and 16% higher than at low temperature at [CO 2 ] of 400, 600 and 800 mol mol -1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod dry weight of peanut increased with increasing CO2 at 25/15C.

Treatment
increasing [CO 2 ]e7
Outcome
Pod dry weighte7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
at 25/15Ce7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e7

“Pod dry weight increased with increasing [CO 2 ] at 25/15C, but was not different among [CO 2 ] levels at 35/25C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2148–2260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod dry weight of peanut was not different among CO2 levels at 35/25C.

Treatment
[CO 2 ] levelse7
Outcome
Pod dry weighte7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Qualifier
at 35/25Ce7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e7

“Pod dry weight increased with increasing [CO 2 ] at 25/15C, but was not different among [CO 2 ] levels at 35/25C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2148–2260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25/15C, pod dry weight of peanut was 50% higher than at 35/25C.

Treatment
25/15Ce2
Outcome
pod dry weighte2
Direction
highere2
Value
50%e2
Comparator
35/ 25Ce2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“At 25/15C, pod dry weight was 50% higher than at 35/ 25C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2262–2318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing temperature from 25/15C to 35/25C reduced peanut pod dry weight by 40%, 53% and 54% at 400, 600 and 800 mol mol -1 CO2.

Treatment
increased from 25/15C to 35/25Ce2
Outcome
pod dry weighte2
Direction
reducede2
Value
40% at 400, 53% at 600, and 54% at 800e2
Comparator
25/15Ce2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“As the temperature increased from 25/15C to 35/25C, pod dry weight was reduced by 40% at 400, 53% at 600, and 54% at 800 mol mol -1 CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2320–2456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature produced more peanut root length in the containers, whereas low temperature did so in the rhizotrons.

Treatment
High temperaturee2
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
moree2
Qualifier
in the containers, whereas low temperature did in the rhizotronse2
Comparator
low temperaturee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“High temperature produced more root length in the containers, whereas low temperature did in the rhizotrons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2459–2566 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and CO2 interacted significantly in their effects on peanut main stem length and above ground biomass.

Treatment
between temperature and [CO 2 ]e2
Outcome
main stem length and above ground biomasse2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were significant interactions between temperature and [CO 2 ] for their effects on main stem length and above ground biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2568–2698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature enhanced growth of peanut shoots and roots.

Treatment
High temperaturee2
Outcome
growth of shoots and rootse2
Direction
enhancede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“High temperature enhanced growth of shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2700–2752 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not interact with higher temperature on peanut reproductive growth.

Treatment
elevated [CO 2 ] with higher temperaturee2
Outcome
reproductive growthe2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“There was no interaction of elevated [CO 2 ] with higher temperature on the reproductive growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2784–2879 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A temperature by CO2 interaction tended to be beneficial for peanut vegetative growth and total shoot dry weight, without statistical significance.

Treatment
temperature by [CO 2 ] interactione2
Outcome
vegetative growth and total shoot dry weighte2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“a tendency for beneficial temperature by [CO 2 ] interaction on vegetative growth and total shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2889–2997 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that the negative effect of high temperature on peanut reproductive growth overwhelmed the beneficial effects of increased CO2 on photosynthesis and growth.

Treatment
high temperaturee2
Outcome
reproductive growthe2
Direction
negativee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots and roots of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–469 · show in text ↑
e2

“The beneficial effects of increased [CO 2 ] on photosynthesis and growth were overwhelmed by the negative effect of high temperature on reproductive growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2999–3154 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

co2 · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.